While I use Linux daily and do support for it, while my company is completely MS-free, I find that many open source 'projects' are complete crap or very close to it. Not just user interface, quality problems, but *sometimes* just plain ignorance of a problem make an interesting project into a gathering of MAS (mutual admiration society) kids.
The same problems remain in Windows-based 'solutions'. The 'products' are sometimes even worse than many of those seen on Linux platforms. And most the crap-writers of these expect you to PAY for it!
Then there are the excellent (free) ones like Apache, PostgreSQL, Inkscape, HandyShopper (for Palm) ... just to name a few.
Linux certainly hosts most open projects. Because it is the infrastructure and its philosophy that support this kind of activity. OTOH MS wants *your money* (they do not care about your well being, security or freedom) and the bunch gathered there also wants *your money*. Mac crowd is different in a sense that it expects simple AND nice looking products over other things. All of them are fiercely territorial and would fight until death for their rights. ;-)
From a usability standpoint any of those three is good enough to get the job done. On certain part of UI one leads, then lags behind. Compiz on Linux is well ahead of Aero and it runs on machines Vista would not even boot. Audio on Linux either sucks or rocks, while on Windows works as advertised (in a Chinese-Engrish :-). OS X runs only on it's own hardware and still has occasional problems and glitches.
The main difference is price and security.
So what are French really doing?
- From price standpoint this is very clear: not paying Microsoft means more money to transfer apps to the other (new) ecosystem.
- From security view: they can control and adjust the operating system (if they wish to) to their own needs and are not left to the (big and bad) foreign company.
- From political standpoint they are just giving 'merde' to everyone else and keeping control and power to themselves. And that's what French are well known for. :-)
- From IT perspective: you will not be forced to re-learn everything on next-gen MS OS, but can enjoy from being standards-compliant.
While having something for free is not always the best option, but having choice certainly is. And not being vendor-locked-in is certainly one of the best choices available.
Then what about French prisons without windows? Who will be held responsible if someone gets cold? And what about not being locked-in?
--
Alfred