significantly change customers' experience with the operating system #
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 13:26 GMT
Endless reboots..
Yep, thats typical of windows.. I can see why they would say that. :)
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 13:26 GMT
Endless reboots..
Yep, thats typical of windows.. I can see why they would say that. :)
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 13:26 GMT
"Meanwhile, Jesper Johansson, a prominent Windows blogger, has claimed that the problem only involves machines using AMD processors."
I'm not putting in another MoBo and processor just to do SP3 on XP
Bah and thrice bah.
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 13:26 GMT
As I am about to put SP3 on a machine I have just taken a snapshot of [it's for an image I am building].
After my previous defense of SP3, who wants to bet a pint that the machine shits itself?
[Dell optiplex GX620 MicroMachine thingy, P4]
Updates on this important event later this afternoon....
Steven R
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 13:32 GMT
Quite right, Windows users have much experience of their PC's rebooting randomly.
No change there then.
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 13:32 GMT
I have updated some of my customers systems (who are all AMD based, as I build their systems) with Service Pack 3 and they have not reported any errors. Me thinks the over-clockers need to set things to default!
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 13:32 GMT
No spontaneous reboots on an AMD64 yet, just the usual resource hogging, hard disk splattering bunk we've come to expect from microsoft.
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 13:46 GMT
... how perfect this service pack is going to be in persuading people that vista is an UP grade.
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 13:46 GMT
continuous loop rebooting isn't actually "significantly change(ing) customers' experience with the operating system"
Micros**tspeak for "this'll maybey make you wish you'd upgraded to vista, you ingrates"
No, it won't. It'll just make me disable auto updates, which might not be such a bad thing after all. (Please, don't patronise me by pointing out the 'risks' of not keeping up to date with the security patches, I'll take that over the risk of SP3 ta very much!)
And they wonder why people are pissed off with them.
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 13:46 GMT
I think it is Dell AMD systems, something to do with the power control. My AMD 3800+ X2 works fine with SP3.
Efros
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 13:46 GMT
Had to do a complete rebuild, disabled auto update till they fix it.
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 13:46 GMT
Hmm.. it actually looks as though it's not really an SP£ problem, it's more of an OEM image problem which is being flagged up by the installation of SP3.
Basically, HP (and others) to save costs produce one hard disk image irrespective of the computer's processor type, and they install the Intel power management driver.
Now, it seems that until SP3 this didn't matter too much and the machine booted OK. However, something's changed in SP3 which means that the Intel power management driver crashes when it's run on an AMD chip (for which there is a separate driver which the OEM should have installed instead).
Don't blame Microsoft for OEM's penny pinching.
(Note: if M$ were to blame I'd be the first to throw the stone.)
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 13:46 GMT
I currently have a AMD 2500+ at home with XP SP2 and a AMD 64FX2 with XP64 SP2.
Could AMD use this in thier Anti-Trust lawsuit against Intel as Intel and MS are in bed together in so many details.
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 13:46 GMT
Oh, wait, i'm running OSX...
(The one clad in aluminium, please.)
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 13:59 GMT
More proof that quality engineering is what people will pay for.
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 13:59 GMT
I have installed SP3 on mine and it seem to work ok and i have got a FX AMD chip in my machine.....however i did shut it down after i installed SP4, which can be a fore warning of loop booting issues i.e. ground hog day screamers. You can tell that Microsoft are not really that bother about XP anymore and consentrating on Vista...trying to fix the bugs in that.
Let hope when i get home tonight that when i do boot up its ok.....crossed fingers and rabits feet... need more than one rabits foot for luck.
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 13:59 GMT
seems ok - went like a breeze on my intel machine.
i also found a bit of free s/w called vistamizer (spelling?) - basically it makes XP look like vista (nicer) but no as slow and annoying (having to lick yes 14x every time you wann do something)
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 13:59 GMT
Happy Vista Home Premium SP1 user here, no issues or glitches. Maybe it's time for people to step up and get off of the legacy OS that is Windows XP. Microsoft should just pull the plug, that sucker is obviously on life support.
/mines the one with the full color silkscreen of BillG on the back...
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 13:59 GMT
As far as I know the overclockers are safe, as I have overclocked my AMD (Phenom too....yes yes asking for it I know) and installed SP3 and it has been running flawlessly since.
One thing I did do before installing was stop all of the extra processes that were running so only thing running was AV.
I say its people who have any version of the Sims installed, they deserve a dead computer
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 13:59 GMT
I saw the auto update and didn't hit download/install, thought i'd wait and see. I'm quite dependant at the mo on my kit and the last thing i want is for any of it to become unusable, think i'll wait a few months before getting this one
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 13:59 GMT
been cookin this cpu for 7 years... still can't kill it. gotta be the OEM issue that Stephen Usher mentioned. Suddenly I'm glad I build my own. I may have to bark at HP about my wife's laptop though. Think I'll back that machine up again this evening just for good measure.
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 14:00 GMT
I have a Semprom 2400+ and XP pro (Select version) 1GB of SDRAM
Machine was already fully updated and had zonealarm and avast
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 14:00 GMT
As I say I have a VIA based motherbord and AMD CPU and did not have problems with XP SP3. There was however an update for the nvidia force NV4 chipset as part of SP3 that might be causing the issue?
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 14:14 GMT
Yes, I know you have all been waiting with baited breath to see if my PC is shafted.
Well, it's not. No issues at all, and an interim "SP3MitNeuProfile.gho" has been created so that I have something to fall back on if Sysprep causes the machine to shit it's biscuits.
Which it probably will.
Ah well!
Just the AXP2400Thoro@2200Mhz to put it on at home now....
Steven "can't afford an A64/Core2Duo" Raith
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 14:30 GMT
"Meanwhile, Jesper Johansson, a prominent Windows blogger, has claimed that the problem only involves machines using AMD processors."
Nope - just done several machines with Athlon64 x2 processors with no problems at all.
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 14:30 GMT
well i dont know what all the fuss is about ive installed the patch (on 3 normal pc's and also on my macs bootcamp/parallels setup) and also the slipstreamed version and had no problems whatsoever. is this another case of people with crap hardware or setups with loads of dodgy software installed.. but as usual blaming the last thing that touched their pc?????
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 14:31 GMT
My neighbour has just had this endless reboot problem (which I've been called on to fix) and at first i thought it was the gdi32.dll problem but after a few hours troubleshooting it turns out i was wrong.
I understand that the problem is with machines where XP was installed from a sysprep image where the original machine has an Intel processor and the target machine has an AMD. There is a registry key that tries to load an intel driver which is normally ignored but for some reason SP3 sets this off again and as the box has an AMD it barfs with a STOP 0x0000007E error which is immediately intelligible to serious windows dudes. Maybe.
So if you've installed your own copy of XP you should be OK.
If anyone wants to contradict this assertion, please go ahead I'm not a windows expert, i just use Solaris and Fedora.
I love these comments, it gives you the chance to show how stupid you are in front of the thousands / millions / one billion squintillion* supremely expert Reg readers out there.
* suggestion for a new unit. One billion squintillion = 1 Reg readership.
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 14:31 GMT
Can't remember if it was SP1 or 2 for XP (THINK it was 2, but no promises...), but there were massive problems with OEM kit there too, IIRC Dell customers in particular had to wait for a "Dell version" of the SP in question.
Sounds like it might be, as Stephen Usher says, this issue, especially as there's prior form for it. Either way, I'm gonna wait for the dust to settle before I install.
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 14:59 GMT
Even better, XP is now faster. Personally I don't know why MSFT did it, only reason that comes to mind is to put another nail in the coffin of Vista.
Still I prefer my home Ubuntu box over my Win work machine, even that work one is *much* faster. Ubuntu just feels so much nicer to use.
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 14:59 GMT
Mike,
I'm making this image with the Dell OEM XP CD - it's working fine.
My 4gb USB pen, with all my tools on it, however, has just died a death and is now residing in the fucking bin.
[must have been SP3 that did it, cough, ahem ;-) ]
Steven R
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 14:59 GMT
I have had this problem before sending an image from an Intel based PC to an AMD PC.
The fix is to boot up using the windows cd and enter the recovery console. From there type: disable intel_ppm
Reboot the PC and all wil lbe fine again
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 14:59 GMT
http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/jesper/archive/2008/05/08/does-your-amd-based-computer-boot-after-installing-xp-sp3.aspx
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 14:59 GMT
I'm quickly losing the remaining dregs of my belief in human intelligence.
Here's a new cut-and-paste comment for the Reg:
I haven't had any problems installing/running/removing/configuring the software/hardware/update on N systems. Since I do/don't/didn't overclock/interrupt the process/drink coffee/own a cat/believe in Xenu, it's obvious everyone who has had problems should/shouldn't overclock/sit on their hands/drink Jolt/[kill their/get a] cat/join Scientology. Problem solved.
SHEESH!
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 14:59 GMT
Buy a Mac.
Seriously. Why not? They are safer, faster and no more expensive. (Despite what a few XP Zealots who have never even tried one will tell you.)
If you've never tried a Mac in recent years, then don't even bother to reply since you have no right to talk about things you've never tried.
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 15:04 GMT
I endorse your cut and paste comment.
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 15:04 GMT
"Windows XP. Microsoft should just pull the plug, that sucker is obviously on life support."
Oh is that why many people are reverting to XP after they have the much hyped 'Vista experience' and decide it's the POS that it is.... XP's still got about 3 quarters of the computer market hasn't it? while Vista numbers dwindle and M$ rush through the next version of Windows?
All in all XP's looking pretty healthy for something 'on life support' to me
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 15:04 GMT
He said it only affected AMD-based processors. That's different from "it affects *all* AMD-based processors". His statement is only disproven if the same problem happens with a non-AMD chip.
If A = "fails to boot up" and B = "AMD-based processor", then the statement is "If A, then B" not "If B, then A". And it's only wrong if you have A and not-B, not if you have not-A and B. If that makes it any clearer.
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 15:04 GMT
I've been running W2k then XP on the same machine for about 8 years now, its been solidly stable with XP SP2 (Xeon 550mhz & 2 meg VGA onboard) I however suspect SP3 will kill it? The patch is free but the new hardware required to support is will annoy me as its money that was ear marked for beer not M$ upgrade you kit tax.
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 15:29 GMT
Running a Pentium D (Presler) @ 3.4Ghz on a clean install of XP SP2 (not an OEM image)
Couldn't download via win update on Tuesday so installed using the stand alone installer.
All OK
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 15:29 GMT
My home machine (AMD Athlon XP2000+ @ 1.67GHz, 1.25GB RAM, ~200GB HD, dual boot Fedora 7/WinXP) was updated last night. Not had any problems as yet, and it was on all night. The only thing that took me by surprise was that my theme was reset to normal (although I was going to do that myself).
I'll see what happens this evening when I get home.
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 15:35 GMT
> Yes, I know you have all been waiting with _baited breath_ to see if my PC is shafted.
Yey! Another pleasing instance of that sneaky entrapment attempt!
Over the past fortnight I've updated 30 PCs and laptops of varying power and age with SP3, and they've taken between 11 minutes and 62 minutes. No, sadly, nothing went wrong...
Mine's the anorak with "Smug Git" on the back, in Gill Sans Extra Bold...
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 16:54 GMT
...maybe this story is just more of Britains current attitude of only talking about things when they go wrong...if it goes right, we just don't bother to say anything.
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 16:54 GMT
I have a problem with a Canon camera not been recognised when plugged into USB on one machine (other OK) but Device Manager is blank, other people seem to have problems with Device Manager being blank.
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 16:56 GMT
... a lot of people don't have a clue at all here and are quick to jump on the usual Microsoft-is-definitely-at-fault-honest bandwagon, when the actual issue is down to how Windows was installed on the PC in the first place.
OEM installs seem to be the problem here (at least something as specific as an OEM preparing an image of a pre-installed image of Windows on an Intel-based PC but using same image on an AMD-based one) so once again the silly fools who blame Microsoft without actually understanding the issue FIRST are the silly ones who look foolish.
At least they've provided some entertainment this Friday afternoon. It's always good to laugh at the people who make it so obvious that they haven't understood the issue at all.
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 16:56 GMT
Working fine on at least 6 machines to far, pretty annoying they removed the address bar though.. fixed by installing MuvEnum Address Bar
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 16:56 GMT
No problems on my homebuilt Shuttle SFF box with AMD 2800+ (VIA chipset iirc) with OEM copy of XP SP2. I had d/l'd the SP from MS but then read some horror stories so I waited until it was put out via Update and did it that way.
I'm a little curious about Vista SP1, though. It doesn't appear on the Update site when I go there on my new Vista laptop. Of course, I just got it on April 21st and there was a boatload of updates that I installed straightaway - possibly everything that was wrapped up into SP1 so that Update doesn't see any need to offer it?
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 16:56 GMT
After putting SP3 on my Acer AMD Turion laptop the machine refused to shut down. Eventually a huge crash corrupted the AV (Avast) and firewall (Comodo) plus programe settings for anything elsethat was running.
Eventually tracked the problem down to the Buffalo Drivestation attached to the Firewire port. After switching it to a spare usb port all is fine, fingers crossed
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 16:56 GMT
Phew ,that is a big relief then after reading all the posts on here. I was in 2 minds whether to download and install or not, and in end I thought "nope I will wait and see how it turns out with others first " , and now I am just happy I did that.
Posted Friday 9th May 2008 16:56 GMT
If you don't know what i need a computer for, you have no right to comment on what computer i should buy.