Virtual Earth puts human face on data
So after choosing microsoft for everything why.... #
Posted Friday 16th May 2008 08:32 GMT
did I choose a Microsoft mapping service?
a) Because I'm a rebel
b) Because I wont try anything outside the MS stack on the project
c) ...
You chose Microsoft because you develop on a very limited stack. This means you limit the problems you have to that of one company.
Apart from the obvious eggs in one basket, the money and the proprietary nature of the software I can understand your simple approach. Its enough of a challenge developing with bleeding edge software.
MS Maps are however, uglier than the Google counterparts.
- Joel
(btw. I note that you skipped the excellent Yahoo maps?)
Why Microsoft #
Posted Monday 19th May 2008 08:34 GMT
We have been using Virtual Earth for the last year or so and we are very happy with the results. I have to say that our main reason for going with Microsoft was the licensing, Google were not easy to deal with on this and seemed to have a ridiculous licensing cost (i'm sure that with more effort we could have found a solution but why bother?) whereas the MS licensing was easy to deal with and, for us at least, was a good pricing structure.
Popular Whitepapers
- 10 Strategies for Choosing a Midmarket ERP Solution
Find out how to use the changing ERP market to your advantage - Enterprise PBX buyer's guide
Access to expert research on all aspects of the IP PBX market - The top 5 server monitoring battles
And how you can win them - Productive high performance computing for upstream petroleum
IBM Cluster solution powered by the Intel Xeon Processor 5500 Series - Straight Talk with Dell: Sending out an SaaS
On Demand Webcast - Enabling the Agile Data Center
On-Demand: Audio Only