at last! #
Posted Wednesday 16th July 2008 11:17 GMT
I think all spammers should receive harsh sentences like this one. Yay for common sense!
Posted Wednesday 16th July 2008 11:17 GMT
I think all spammers should receive harsh sentences like this one. Yay for common sense!
Posted Wednesday 16th July 2008 12:02 GMT
£90k fine- a few pence per user affected and 65 seconds per message seems fine to me, so long as no-one was hurt and nothing "bad" happenned besides someone going "Oh, bloody spam!" or getting beaten up for quoting monty python for the 70th time that day.
I would also make a point of getting a list of the proxies he used and inform their ISPs that this is happenning.
But yeah, seems entirely reasonable to me.
Posted Wednesday 16th July 2008 12:02 GMT
I see the slaps on the hand made no difference in the past then
Surely once someone has got to 2 or 3 prior convictions its time to say "hes going to do it again" or "hang the fucker"?
Posted Wednesday 16th July 2008 12:02 GMT
Brilliant. That should be the bench mark for all spammers from now on.
Send twelvty gabazillion spam message, spend your life in jail.
Posted Wednesday 16th July 2008 13:08 GMT
sold so many pen1s enlargement pumps & v1agra now!
Posted Wednesday 16th July 2008 13:08 GMT
Surely the spam is advertising a company, so why not also hit them with massive fines for advertising in this way?
Posted Wednesday 16th July 2008 13:08 GMT
30 months? I didn't even know there was a law against it!
How is this any different to the junk mail which I physically get shovelled through my door on a daily basis, for crap I don't need or want, such as kitchens, estate agents and credit card companies?
Posted Wednesday 16th July 2008 13:08 GMT
Please please please nothing for him to eat but spam.
Every meal.
Every day.
For 30 months.
Posted Wednesday 16th July 2008 13:08 GMT
They should make him write a hand written letter of apology to each person he spammed.
Posted Wednesday 16th July 2008 13:50 GMT
>"30 months? I didn't even know there was a law against it!"
Then you're not mad, just fantastically ignorant. Google "CAN-SPAM" to find out exactly how little attention you've been paying for the past five years.
Posted Wednesday 16th July 2008 14:59 GMT
"How is this any different to the junk mail which I physically get shovelled through my door on a daily basis, for crap I don't need or want, such as kitchens, estate agents and credit card companies?"
Difference is: They pay to send that junk.
With Spam you pay to receive it.
Posted Wednesday 16th July 2008 15:17 GMT
Might I suggest starting here;
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/buspubs/canspam.shtm
I could go on but can't be arsed.
Simon
Posted Wednesday 16th July 2008 17:26 GMT
The US has a do-not-call database. Canada has a clumsy imitation of its own. The US version will not accept Canadian telephone numbers and vice versa.
So the Montreal boiler room operators target the gullible in the US and vice versa.
The key element in this is that many (most? all?) telemarketing calls are scams of one sort or another, some obviously and overtly criminal, others more subtly so. I regularly receive calls from an outfit apparently based in Tacoma, Washington. This outfit is well-known on the web to be engaged in "vishing" (voice phishing) for CC details they can sell, yet the authorities do not act.
Time to flatly outlaw not only e-spam but t-spam.
Stop it now!
Posted Wednesday 16th July 2008 19:26 GMT
Give them five or ten minutes per email. A decade or so in the slammer should get the message across.
Posted Wednesday 16th July 2008 19:38 GMT
sounds like a fair international standard. Course that puts certain Russian mafiosa and Chinese government trolls in jail for multiple lifetimes. Oh well. Consequences suck, don't they?
Posted Wednesday 16th July 2008 22:16 GMT
30 months in jail is excessive?
no bloody friggin way add hard labor in very nasty places to boot and daily cane whippings!And maybe just maybe i just maybe would consider it as a justifiable punishment...
same should apply to telemarketers....
BTW one of the problems these parasites exist in first place is because of companies that hire them in first place. so why not go after the people and individuals( particulary individuals since they are the ones making the decision to use these people in first place) and make them serve the sentences side by side?
in for the penny in for the pound as the saying goes...
Posted Thursday 17th July 2008 08:27 GMT
Not long enough.
Not NEARLY long enough. I think about a month per spam would give them something to think about. These bastards are wrecking the internet.
Even better - a year per spam!!
( I have the words 'death penalty' running about in my head, but that might be a *bit* too harsh... maybe...)