I think Server 2008 is a damned fine product as it is.

And we know what usually happens with MS "design goals...

The important question on everyone's (mine) minds is are they going to port WHS to Small Business 2008 so we can get a 64b OS for the WHS community.

Meh, we've not even started rolling out server 2008 yet, they are having a giggle if they think people will keep upgrading.

The new version /must/ always be over the corner. Otherwise software company like Microsoft would have to fire programmers and dissolve. Or change modus operandi, but that takes lots of courage.

Surely compatibility with Vista/2008 is a design REQUIREMENT not a fekkin goal. sheeesh.

Why the fuss ? Where's the story ?

As far as the server road map is concerned it's been around for 5 years. Two years after the initial release there is the R2 release.

The reason for an R2 release is that it should coincide with the release of a new version of the workstation and keeps client/server functionality aligned.

There's absolutely nothing new here, the information is at least 5 years old.

Lets be honest here, how long until Windows Server 2008 SP1 before anyone will seriously consider buying and upgrading their systems... only to find that the applications and tools you actually need will have to be reg hacked to make them work. Linux anyone?

Major upgrade as in embodies one or more significant technical improvements?

or

Major upgrade as in embodies the potential for significant profitability improvements?

theyve released most people who code and do IT tech prefer windows to look like win98 shell. and still have to add it to windows 7