Pillar, EMC, and HP bow to the Oracle
The problem with app specific hardware #
Posted Tuesday 23rd September 2008 20:16 GMT
The problem is when the app vendor tires of dealing with your very expensive toy then the gear becomes practically useless and you must rebuy your entire storage system to match the next database version because the old version is no longer supported.
Hopefully you'll be in your next job by then.
Pillar is not a surprise #
Posted Wednesday 24th September 2008 00:19 GMT
I guess you guys don't go and search your own archives El Reg! Pillar is owned by none other than Ellison, so one would have to bet that it bloody well better work with Oracle.
App specific HW is dead, dud, done in the mid-90's and each failed attempt by Oracle for HW specifics (or Network Computing, another Ellison dream) have failed in the market. Doing HW specific storage completely nullifies how storage HW is bought -- from whichever company our CIO is in love with this time.
The real fly in the ointment will be migrating from one vendor to the other were one to foolishly do this.
Popular Whitepapers
- 10 Strategies for Choosing a Midmarket ERP Solution
Find out how to use the changing ERP market to your advantage - Enterprise PBX buyer's guide
Access to expert research on all aspects of the IP PBX market - The top 5 server monitoring battles
And how you can win them - Productive high performance computing for upstream petroleum
IBM Cluster solution powered by the Intel Xeon Processor 5500 Series - Straight Talk with Dell: Sending out an SaaS
On Demand Webcast - Enabling the Agile Data Center
On-Demand: Audio Only