@Israeli company #
Posted Friday 16th January 2009 23:32 GMT
Um excuse me. I must of been hallucinating when I drive past their HQ ever day in Santa Clara ,Ca.
Do they operations in Israel ? Yes but Intel is an AMERICAN COMPANY.
Posted Friday 16th January 2009 21:37 GMT
Having a conscience, it's not so bad to see an Israeli company not doing so well.
This understanding comes from being a former “insider,”
Posted Friday 16th January 2009 23:32 GMT
Um excuse me. I must of been hallucinating when I drive past their HQ ever day in Santa Clara ,Ca.
Do they operations in Israel ? Yes but Intel is an AMERICAN COMPANY.
Posted Saturday 17th January 2009 01:01 GMT
Cos we can't buy any new kit anyway.
Fuckin ell, we'll be lucky if we get the budget to power the current servers up the way this year has gone so far.
Posted Saturday 17th January 2009 17:23 GMT
Actually, after understanding what are the real results from Indian R&D intel moved most of it in Israel. Core and its accompanying chipsets at least initially were started as skunkworks projects in Intel Israel division. At the same time the Indians were claiming that they will deliver faster, better bigger P4 next month, then the month after that, then the month after that while falsifying expenses. Satyam is not an exemption - Satyam like behaviour is the rule as the Intel Indian R&D debacle showed us a few years back.
However it is only Intel so far to admit it and take measures on the subject by moving their R&D to Israel.
So from an R&D perspective Intel is indeed an Israeli company.
Probably from a cultural perspective as well. It is quite clear that in a classic Anglo-Saxon mind the joy from seeing the other side "bend-over" in an indian outsourcing relationship is capable to overcome commercial prudence and ability to count the pennies. That does not happen with Jews. To be blunt nothing can overcome their commercial prudence. So the conjecture that it was Jewish influence that made Intel the only company to realise that Indian outsourcing provides solely bend-over joy and no delivery is not that far off.
Posted Sunday 18th January 2009 07:04 GMT
I'd guess that of all orgaisations in the world intel knows the importance of keeping all of the wheels spinning and working.
Perhaps it is better to mothball standing stock (wherever it is?) and keep the plants running?
The alternative of stopping plants while warehouses dwindle of stock seems a bit dull, lethargic and loses a sharp edge yes?
Besides that, we all know that the standing stock will be very welcome in 12 months or 18 months either in stack 'em high distributors in developed world OR in cutting edge stuff in the developing world.
Oh how I wonder what an informed analysis would make of the alternatives?
No disrespect meant at all to intel, AMD, ... but Go Guys Go!
Posted Monday 19th January 2009 11:27 GMT
Were not selling this crap cos its not appealing to the public.. What should we do?
a) Release something the public will buy.. or
b) Not release anything leave the shops full of non-moving stock and wait till us and the shops all go bankrupt.. then ask for a bailout..
hmm..
Posted Monday 19th January 2009 13:24 GMT
<phealing philosofikal>
Why delay the future and prolong the present?
</phealing philosofikal>
Posted Monday 19th January 2009 23:58 GMT
So then you're saying the Jews are the only ones to realize , getting taken by out souring is dumb ??