Fortune 1000 in Cisco California rush
Are the big companies that Cisco Systems is targeting ready to seriously consider the networking giant as a server provider for their data centers? Apparently so, if you believe the results of a recent survey of Fortune 1000 customers done by investment bank Goldman Sachs. As part of its launch of the C-Series rack-mounted x64 …
This topic is closed for new posts.
Posted Tuesday 9th June 2009 06:36 GMT
Padmasree Warrior #
Wow, an even cooler name than "Max Powers".
Skull and crossbones cuz pirates are cool too
Posted Wednesday 10th June 2009 12:53 GMT
More expensive? So what? #
Customers have been buying products for reasons other than price for years.
In the X86 space, HP has typically been 30% more than Dell. IBM 50% more than Dell. You don't see Dell with 100% market share, do you?
Fortune 2000 customers are used to paying mega $millions for traditional Unix servers. HP and IBM were harldy likely to promote porting applications from HP_UX and AIX to x86 in these situations and few customers were prepared to listen to Dell.
However, when a game-changer such as Cisco comes in and talks about industry standard servers and virtualization, customers are very likely to listen.
When the price of Cisco x86 is compared to IBM, HP (or Sun) Unix, the cost looks very competitive.
This topic is closed for new posts.
Most read
Popular Whitepapers
- Transforming IT culture
to assure business service quality and improve IT operational efficiency - The Register Webcast: Storage Virtualization
An introduction to the implications for enterprise IT - The Register Webcast - Desktop Support : The Hub of IT
Watch the webcast of The Register's recent desktop support seminar - The Great Virtualization Debate
Practitioner insights into the where, why and how - The Register Guide to managing spam
A primer on the implications for enterprise IT - The Register Guide to iSCSI
A primer on Internet SCSI, a protocol to transport SCSI commands over IP
Driving Situational Awareness:
Reshaping IT
Assuring application service quality
Application Performance Management: