Data Domain has added a 4-socket quad-core processor set-up and produced a top-end DD880 box with double the performance of its old range-topper, reminding everybody why EMC and NetApp fought so hard to get it. The DD880 has twice the performance of the previous top-of-the-range DD690 and achieves it by having a 4-socket quad- …
This topic is closed for new posts.
Posted Monday 20th July 2009 13:58 GMT
FalconStor has the reputation as the industry's fastest enterprise VTL/Dedupe. Combined with the fact that you can put it on top of any one else's storage (whereas Data Domain's enterprise solution is NOT a gateway and you are stuck with their junk disk) why wouldn't they be apart of the conversation? EMC uses a pared down version of FalconStor's VTL.
Posted Monday 20th July 2009 20:18 GMT
So it could do with new drivers and is rather prone to failures, such as catching fire?
Posted Wednesday 22nd July 2009 08:40 GMT
So this monster enterprise solution from Data Domain is fast but missing HA capability? A Ferrari without brakes?
Posted Sunday 26th July 2009 21:27 GMT
Falconstor/Sun wins speediest dedupe race
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/09/deduplication_performance/
The article mentions an ingestion rate of 11,000 MB/s, which I believe is 39TB/hour. Your Data Domain article mentions an ingestion rate of 5.4TB/hour
"The ingest rate of 5.4TB/hour is faster than any other backup/dedupe controller product, whether they do inline deduplication, (as Data Domain does,) post-process deduplication, or no deduplication at all."
This topic is closed for new posts.
Back to the article
Transforming IT culture
Driving Situational Awareness:
Application Performance Management:
Ensuring service assurance in the new normal
