The Channel logo

back to article Feds seek 'compliance program' for US kit reseller

Two men have been charged with fencing stolen EMC equipment and wire fraud offences relating to almost a million dollars of nicked hardware. A US equipment reseller firm allegedly implicated in fencing of stolen kit also faces a landmark suspended-sentence "compliance program". Kevin Kelly, 33, of North Carolina and Mark …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.
Thumb Up

So, at EMC prices . . .

"Between 2000 and 2009 the feds allege Kelly, who was working at EMC's North Carolina factory, stole $929, 891 worth of hardware."

He walked out with, what, five hard drives and a screwdriver?

0
0
Anonymous Coward

Yay ignorant fearmongering

"United States Attorney Carmen M. Ortiz, said: “Congress and the public have become increasingly concerned with the ease by which people can unlawfully obtain items and sell them over the Internet under false or assumed identities,” said United States Attorney Carmen M. Ortiz."

A couple seconds thought tell me that this is simply not true. To wit: It is actually slightly harder to trade under "false or assumed identities" online than it is in the real world. What is easier online is to find trusting people who'll take the kit off your hands. eBay has had a major hand in this, but I don't see ms Ortiz lambasting them. Speculating as to the why I'll leave as an excercise.

So either dear ms Ortiz is implying congress and public are ignorant and/or stupid, or she herself is, or perhaps both. In any case, she's not doing anyone a favour by trying to turn put the screws on just about everyone's privacy because of a couple bad apples. Even the stolen kit still has to be obtained physically, or you'd have a different scam.

What is very, very abusable is online ordering --or before that, by mail order(!)-- with stolen credit card details, but that problem lies in how credit cards work: You "prove" your identity by handing over all the details. You simply cannot fix that by requiring even more details to be handed over, like "scanned or photocopied government ID". That just makes you *more* vulnerable and means *more* ID theft will be happening, not less.

So, dear ms Ortiz, please take back your words and eat them. Then find somebody competent to explain to you the relevant details of how you should do your job. DHS style fearmongering is not something the American Public will thank you for.

0
0
This topic is closed for new posts.

Forums

Opinion

Privacy image

Frank Jennings

Two working parties, ministers galore... but data transfer law remains in limbo
EMC_Unity_bezel

Chris Evans

It does simplify the hardware setup, whatever it is
A microscopic view of the biometric shark skin. Pic: James Weaver

Chris Mellor

Do something and stop faffing about in the bush league

Kat Hall

International system in general needs greater transparency

Features

Nerd fail photo via Shutterstock
Shouting match
Single market vs. rest of the world
hacker
Mostly it's financial crime. Here's what all the cool kids' terms mean in English
Apple logo. Pic: Blake Patterson
Plenty of bumps in the 40-year road for Mac makers