I see where they are coming from but...
Following the EU's argument to it's logical conclusion, they would be in favour of preventing Intel from ever including security onto the chip, even if they developed it themselves. That stance would obviously is ridiculous. In that case, why would buying in such expertise, instead of developing it all from scratch be of concern?
It seems to me that if a security software firm were to complain (I'm not saying any have), then they could be construed as trying to promote an unsafe environment for computing to be performed in.
Discuss...