The Channel logo

back to article NexGen boss: If solid hardness isn't stuck into PCIe - forget it

Using flash memory, deduplication and predictable performance the iSCSI array has been reinvented by the founders of LeftHand Networks in the shape of NexGen Storage's n5. LeftHand Networks was acquired by HP and is now the HP P4000 line. It competes with Dell's EqualLogic iSCSI arrays, and NexGen is squaring up to both of them …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.

CTO, Nimble Storage

Claims of performance benefits of connecting flash directly to PCIe rather than to a storage HBA are exaggerated, especially in the context of flash in networked storage.

The extra overhead of introducing a storage HBA is in tens of microseconds, which is dwarfed by other latencies such as flash access and network transfer, which are often in hundreds of microseconds. Shaving off a few tens of microseconds is not a noticeable improvement in the end-to-end latency for most applications.

On the other hand, using flash in a disk drive form factor brings significant advantages such as the ability to share it across controllers and to service it non-disruptively.

0
0

Re: Umesh

The facts speak for themselves. The maximum throughput to the backend disk subsystem through a RAID storage controller (storage HBA) is the bandwidth of the PCIe slot that the HBA is plugged into. Now if one solid state device can saturate an x8 PCIe slot, then the storage HBA is bottlenecked with one drive, let alone many SSD drives combined with many rotating drives. It's like placing RAM behind a drive HBA. Realistically, most of the storage HBAs on the market can’t even come close to x8 throughput because of other bottlenecks and overheads. One NexGen SSD device runs at x8 line rate, it can be shared across storage processor domains, and can be serviced non-disruptively. For more details see NexGen's blog on this subject:

http://nexgenstorage.com/ssd-big-technical-illusion

0
0
Silver badge

Should go like the wind

PCIe attached shared storage should be insanely fast. If the data is in the RAM cache we're talking latencies measured in nanoseconds, not microseconds. It does limit the number of servers that can be attached to the storage, and the distance though.

0
0
This topic is closed for new posts.

Forums

Opinion

WWI French tank picture via Shutterstock
Vinod_Khosla

Chris Mellor

A VC with startup agenda slams established suppliers. Surprised? Neither were we
ZenPad_RealRacing
Boy writes a letter to Santa. Pic via Shutterstock

Kat Hall

Cornwall's win over BT should be a cautionary relationship tale

Features

Eclipse image via Shutterstock
The Azure Portal: Microsoft is betting on cloud for its future business
container_ship_hamburg_shutterstock_648
Michael Dell. Pic by Joi Ito
Cool Texas dude is just your average billionaire