back to article 'Boutique' ISPs: Snub the Big 4 AND get great service

As we've seen in recent weeks, broadband in the UK is far from perfect, and in some areas is still disappointingly slow, and with a limited number of choices. Much of the market belongs to a handful big companies such as BT, TalkTalk, Sky and Virgin Media. Like big companies in every market, they adopt a particular approach: …

Page:

  1. supermoore

    Quick correction

    Both TalkTalk Technology and Vodafone use Dynamic Line Management on their LLU platforms, not just BTW. The protocols are different, with different levels of sophistication. TalkTalk and Vodafone will only manage line rate at the DSL layer, whereas BT then match that with management at the IP layer too.

    The upshot is that on BTW if you replace a crappy filter your line rate will go up fairly quickly, but your actual speed (IP Profile) will lag up to 2 weeks behind unless you go through painful support processes. On the other networks, changes to DSL rate are instantly reflected in throughput.

    1. Anthony Hegedus Silver badge

      Re: Quick correction

      Though I've noticed that sky LLU does this stupid lag thing too.

      And the advantage of talktalk LLU is that they have *some* control at least over the line speed. BTW doesn't.

      It's all due to trying to run a 21st century technology over a 19th century network.

      1. Gordon 10

        Re: Quick correction

        19th century network or 19th century company?

      2. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Quick correction

        "It's all due to trying to run a 21st century technology over a 19th century network."

        Don't they, erm, run over the same last mile network?

    2. ccomley

      Re: Quick correction

      Supermoore - true enough, but another benefit of a small friendly and knowledgeable ISP is once you've changed out the faulty hardware, you can ask them to request a profile reset, which short-circuits that procedure!

  2. A Non e-mouse Silver badge
    Happy

    A&A ++++

    Can I be the first to post a massive big up vote for A&A.

    The joys of not having to deal with Mickey Mouse call centre staff is wonderful. (Either for technical or billing problems)

    Sure, they don't officially provide out-of-ours support, but a few weeks ago when there was a problem at night, I jumped on IRC and their tech support staff were already on the case.

    In the case of ISPs, big is most definitely NOT better.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: A&A ++++

      While I'm sure A+A are a good ISP, for techno junkies especially, I have to say that despite 30+ years in IT, I've found a few of the 'niche' ISPs to have tetchy call handling staff, or I caught them at the end of a long shift perhaps. Additionally, several 'niche' ISPs work a 'business hours' line, so may be closed when a residential use might need them most, on the weekend or evening, and have more limited support. I'm not pointing at A+A but smaller ISPs in general.

      As for fixed IP, I'm quite disgusted that some ISPs charge a monthly fee for this, or require a user to be on a significantly more expensive type of account before offering it. I'm using a couple of landlines, one is using TalkTalk wholesale (but has none of the filtering applied, I feel sure) and the other by Primus (now calling themselves Fuel Broadband {!}) for cheap (5.99 inc) line rental and Plusnet for BB (with fixed IP for which I had an 'opt in' some years ago, but is offered at a once-only fee for new customers).

      Both ISPs have UK call centres, straightforward charges, and truly unlimited usage (I added a second line, as backup, <u>when my usage exceeded 350 GB a month</u>, mostly from downloading free video podcasts on iTunes from Twit.TV, viewing webcams, or "on demand" viewing of 4oD, Demand 5, etc, as I don't work the "9 to 5" and am often asleep from 1600 to 0000).

      With 750K (I think) customers, and rising, they are not without the 1% with problems over billing, installation (sometimes down to Openreach, but then again it's usually the ISPs that get the blame), or other issues. Not perfect (is any ISP?) but pretty good, and in my view a "good value ISP" (my username!).

      I know for business users Plusnet has a dedicated team, on different phone numbers, and while sometimes their residential call centre is deluged with calls, (and launched a second call centre in Leeds to cope with the growth,) they seem to live up to their "open and honest" approach when it comes to problems, and respond on a range of external discussion boards, to all sorts of enquiries, rather than only use their own ticketing / social media / website methods for contact.

      No doubt there will be a few Plusnet haters along any minute but FWIW, I would not have recommended them to family if I felt they were not worthy of giving a mention.

  3. chriswakey

    Xilo is hard to beat

    Xilo (https://www.xilo.net/adsl_broadband/) is fantastic.

    Rock solid connection, static IP, and absolutely no download cap...I approached 700 gig one month* with no complaints from them.

    *my old NAS went tits up with no backup, so I downloaded all the content again, as I couldn't be arsed re-ripping all my DVDs/Blu-Rays

    1. keithpeter Silver badge
      Windows

      Re: Xilo is hard to beat

      The Talk and Surf product capped at 10Gb/month traffic looks ok to me as it includes line rental.

      Now to investigate the *process of switching* (groan) both Internt (EE) and phone line (BT). Sigh...

    2. batfastad

      Re: Xilo is hard to beat

      +1 for Xilo

      Went there for their O2 Wholesale connections after my Be connection was about to be migrated to Sky. Unfortunately O2 Wholesale were sold off so had to migrate to a TT wholesale connection. Not actually noticed any difference and Xilo handled the whole thing really well.

  4. Gavin Hamill

    Where is Zen Internet in this advertorial?

    Zen have been going since 1995, don't limit, don't police, don't get in the way and I would heartily recommend them having been a customer since the dial-up days!

    1. RustyNailed

      Re: Where is Zen Internet in this advertorial?

      That's was I was thinking. I was with Zen for several years of extremely good service (both delivery and customer) before moving abroad. I just wish I could get them here ;)

    2. Nigel Whitfield.

      Re: Where is Zen Internet in this advertorial?

      Every attempt of mine to get through to Zen's press contact line while I was writing this piece was met with hold music. Had it not been for that, they would certainly have been mentioned.

      1. No Quarter

        Re: Where is Zen Internet in this advertorial?

        If you rang support, they would have answered straight away.

      2. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Where is Zen Internet in this advertorial?

        I dont know what is going on at Zen, they have lost a lot of potential customers in the last 12 months by failing to answer phone or email enquiries - and not just a few isolated cases either, a LOT of people on the ISP forums - including the Mods - have commentated on it.

        A pity, because they are a VERY good ISP.

        (I couldnt get through to Zen despite 2 weeks of trying - and I was in urgent need of a new ISP after my old one went rogue on me - so signed up with Aquiss - who are also very good at tech support).

        1. Glen 1

          Re: Where is Zen Internet in this advertorial?

          It could be argued that perhaps the smaller ISPs don't want 'a lot of potential customers' if it means expanding to the point that their service suffers.

          There is little point in recommending an ISP aimed at techies to Nan and Grandad. The filter that is first line support is there for a reason, as much as it might irritate us.

          That said, if they do start to get bigger, they will probably follow Plusnet's lead and get bought out...

        2. Peter Foulkes

          Re: Where is Zen Internet in this advertorial?

          "I dont know what is going on at Zen"

          I sadly have to agree. I've been a Zen customer for many years and found their telephone support, both technical and administrative to be exemplary.

          Until recently.

          50% of my recent contacts with them have been very poor. I changed to FTTC and the first technical contact's knowledge was dismal. Second person I spoke to was up to their previously high standard. The last time I spoke to someone in accounts who was rude and unhelpful enough for me to consider terminating both of my contracts with them. Other calls have been a disappointing experience and the time it takes to get through has increased drastically.

          I have publicly endorsed and recommended Zen in the past. I rated them that highly as a company to deal with. They were a refreshing change and I was quite willing to pay more for my broadband just because I liked the company and their apparent ethos. My experience in the last 3 months is that they are not the same company.

          Peter

    3. M Mouse
      Meh

      Re: Where is Zen Internet in this advertorial?

      Have they actually come up with any statement on IPv6 yet? I've seen a few comments that users don't know when they will support it and Zen seems hardly keen to clarify their plans... though I think they had some trial running a while back.

      By the way, I quite agree that it looks very much to be an advertorial, while on the other side of the fence, at least it comes up in the Newsnow headlines about ISPs, so might 'inform' a few about options other than the big 4 (/5, /6) ISPs.

      1. Nigel Whitfield.

        Re: Where is Zen Internet in this advertorial?

        Well, it's certainly not advertorial - no consideration asked for, offered, or received in respect of any of the ISPs mentioned.

        Weekend features have less hard tech in them than weekday ones. We wanted to explain the possibilities available, rather than give an exhaustive list. So I aimed to mention a few examples, based on both personal experience and who I could get comment from in the time allowed.

    4. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Where is Zen Internet in this advertorial?

      Zen don't seem to know what IPv6 is. That's a pretty big failing.

      1. M Mouse

        Re: Where is Zen Internet in this advertorial?

        Good to see someone commenting on Zen and IPv6 gets upvoted - maybe my comment was downvoted as some people can only cope with 140 characters or less :)

        PS But I felt sure Zen had had some IPv6 trial... or was that when they proved a lack of clue ?

    5. Evan Essence
      Meh

      Re: Where is Zen Internet in this advertorial?

      Where is Zen's IPv6 service?

  5. jason 7

    I've seen these kind of ISPs before.

    You suddenly get a buzz around the office "Oh this ISP is fantastic...super speeds...super price..amazing!"

    A haze of smug wafts around the office.

    And they are great...for the first few months, then standards just nosedive and folks are moving on to the next latest and greatest.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: I've seen these kind of ISPs before.

      Several down votes - these will be the people who STILL believe that £1.99 a month can get you fast, unlimited broadband.

      My favourite ISP scam was the guy who figured out the flaw in a certain major ISPs "First three months Free" package a few years back - and earned himself a six figure sum before legging it out of the country.

      1. Chris King

        Re: I've seen these kind of ISPs before.

        "Several down votes - these will be the people who STILL believe that £1.99 a month can get you fast, unlimited broadband."

        Or maybe they down-voted Jason 7 because he missed the point. The ISP's in the article have all been around for a while, and certainly more than "six months".

        Zen started in 1996, AAISP in 1997, Xilo in 2007, ICUK and Merula have been around for a while too.

        There are plenty of cheap ISP's that have started well and gone to crap in a matter of months, and there are plenty of "Elder God" ISP's out there that have turned into rebranded services (Demon, Pipex, Nildram ?) or seem to have gone nowhere (ClaraNet ?). None of the ISP's in this article belong in either of those categories.

        I've been with AAISP for nearly ten years, and the service has been consistently good. I hear lots of good things from folks on Zen and Xilo too.

    2. M Mouse

      Re: I've seen these kind of ISPs before.

      Just wondering if you had a particular ISP in mind as the target of suspicion ?

      It's perhaps true to say there are a lot of ISPs one may never have heard of, but I am sure I've heard of all of the ones mentioned in the article and comments. I know of none that are 'younger' than maybe 5 years but clearly you think that 'niche' = 'risky' ...

    3. ccomley

      Re: I've seen these kind of ISPs before.

      Jason7 - you may have mis-understood what Nigel was getting at. The names he mentioned have all been around for many years. Yes, there's always the risk of the fly-by-night cowboy brigade who've worked out they can get a quick profit out of setting up an operation, locking in a few customers, then legging it before the bills need paying. Some of us have been around for over 20 years however. (And yes, that's pre-broadband and pre-dial-up - not all of us started out as ISPs!)

  6. Andy Tunnah

    Jammy git

    I dunno how but I've always been blessed by the God Of Awesome Interwebs.

    From being one of the very first users of broadband at 512mb, to truly unlimited Pipex 8mbit (even though after I moved out they tried to screw my parents by changing the contract, then issuing them a £2000 bill ha), to getting Sky which has been nothing but an absolute pleasure - 24mbit for a tenner, now up to 40mbit for 20 quid, and I abuse it like a champion.

    I'm a storage whore, cloud just doesn't sit well with me, so have about 90tb local storage, and it's not uncommon to do 2tb/month or more. Never had an issue or complaint, or throttling of any kind.

    The only time I've not been happy was when my missus passed away, I went to stay with a mate for a while, get away from things, and he had 100mbit...when I finally came back home, 40mbit seemed almost archaic. But he has throttling, and can only open up at certain times, which is a bit of a pain.

    1. John Brown (no body) Silver badge
      Joke

      Re: Jammy git

      "I'm a storage whore, cloud just doesn't sit well with me, so have about 90tb local storage, and it's not uncommon to do 2tb/month or more."

      Crikey! Do you run

      rsync -avz root@youtube.com:/mainstorage /myYouTubeBackup

      every night?

    2. Chris King

      Re: Jammy git

      I'm the reverse - some ISP's go up like a Bond Baddie's hide-out after I've been with them for a while !

    3. ccomley

      Re: Jammy git

      When I first bought a car with "traction control" it was horrible. If the wheels started spinning, the TC just backed off the throttle and kept it off for half a second to a second. It felt like something was wrong with the engine. Nothing you could do could get it to start trying to turn the wheels again until it was good and ready. Now modern TC systems work by momentary dabs of brake to the spinning wheel and letting non-spinning wheels continue to dive, and it all happens so quickly you tend not to even notice it, until the TC system fails and you realised just how much loose gravel there is on that hill there or how slippery the carpark behind Marks is...

      In similar vein the bandwidth management tools used by some ISPs are way more subtle these days. I think you'll find that any bit-torrent, emule, or other similar traffic that you may be using to fill up that 90TB store will run flat out much of the time. But at times when the core network is busy, your traffic will be "de-prioritised". That doesn't mean it WILL slow down, but it means it MIGHT slow down at moments when there's enough higher priority traffic to need all the available bandwidth. This really doesn't matter for the sort of process where you're not sitting waiting to launch an app or start reading a document as soon as it finishes downloading.

      However, it MAY matter to some, and for them, totally unrestricted service can be arranged. Yes, it costs a little more, but it's their choice.

      Sadly, there are still some systems where the newer subtleties have yet to be discovered, and they work on an older model of bulk traffic WILL be slowed down.

    4. Sir Runcible Spoon
      WTF?

      Re: Jammy git

      "The only time I've not been happy was when my missus passed away, I went to stay with a mate for a while, get away from things, and he had 100mbit...when I finally came back home, 40mbit seemed almost archaic."

      I don't wish to sound callous, but the wording of your post seems to imply that you were more unhappy about only having 40mbit instead of 100mbit than your wife passing away.

      I'm sure I'm wrong, I just wanted to get clarification so I didn't misunderstand.

      1. Andy Tunnah

        Re: Jammy git

        That was what you took away from that ? You're a strange duck.

        My missus passing was what caused me to go live with a friend, which is when I experienced 100mbit. Upon returning home 40mbit seemed almost archaic, which is pretty much the only time I've been sad at my internet.

        Better ?

  7. Pen-y-gors

    Takeover time

    In the past I've been with several smaller ISPs, usually because they offered a better deal, or better service. And they did for a couple of years....until they were sold to one of the big players and it was time to move on.

    At the moment I'm with BT Business, who aren't bad, and at least have UK call centres. When FTTC finally arrives I'll maybe shop around again.

    1. Nigel Whitfield.

      Re: Takeover time

      There certainly has been a hell of a lot of consolidation - many of the names that featured in some of the early ISP roundups I did for PCW have long since vanished.

      But a lot of the others do seem to manage to remain independent, either through being so small that they're probably not a likely takeover target, or through doing the sort of hybrid trick of being both an aggregator and a direct seller (Zen, Merula, ICUK, AAISP).

      It's possible that, in time, some of those might be swallowed up by some of the big four, certainly. But by and large they seem to have enough scale to keep going on their own, and they've never really been chasing the low margin end of the market.

      I think that in the case of a fair few of those that fell by the wayside, it was the chasing after volume and low price at the same time that tended to prove their undoing.

      1. M Mouse

        Re: Takeover time

        Sorry, just a quick aside, Nigel, but did you work at OUCS quite a long time ago (25+ years is about the time when I worked in another institution, on the south coast).

        1. Nigel Whitfield.

          Re: Takeover time

          Nope; never worked there. Though (distressingly!) there are other Nigel Whitfields available.

          1. M Mouse

            Re: Takeover time

            Re Nigel Whitfield(s) - Ah, OK.

            Yes, there are a distressing number of MyName MySurname too.

            Around 200 of the blighters, when checked in the late 1990s

      2. ccomley

        Re: Takeover time

        We're often asked "are you selling the business?"

        Well we're not. And we won't. The only time that's likely to happen is if the main folk involved reach retirement age, and the plan then would be to back out gracefully whilst finding the customer base new homes which supply the same sort of service we try to supply, rather than dump the whole thing off on <no name mentioned> and run.

        We realised we could make more money out of our business if we ran it differently, automated more processes, used cheap "follow the script" support methods, websites which make it nearly impossible for you to find out how to call an actual person, etc., but we choose not to. And we would design our exit strategy, when the time comes, in a similar manner.

    2. Ken Moorhouse Silver badge

      Re: Takeover time

      The first ISP I was on were Technocom in Slough who invited me over for tea and biscuits, followed by a tour of their co-location areas. They got taken over by Easynet who were I think ok (I can't remember now TBH), but one of my clients wanted me to setup their system with a company called Frontier in Wales. The thing with Frontier was that you got a fixed IP, no blocking of ports and comprehensive technical support. I switched allegiance to them (as a reseller) until the bitter end when they got taken over by Mistral. Mistral started bombarding me with invoices for services I'd never ordered and they were a vile company to deal with, for that reason. Finally got over 50 credit notes from them, which was round about the time of their take-over by Kcom (draw your own conclusions if you will) As a result of that experience I've vowed never to be the middle-man for an ISP ever again.

      My experience with take-overs then is that they can be very disruptive, and I worry that my current ISP (Zen) will sooner or later succumb to a similar fate.

  8. Mage Silver badge
    Alert

    Columbia Internet for Canuks?

    Archive 1997 - 2006

    Not real. But the author was originally a Web guy for a real Canadian ISP, not Rodgers.

    The bigger ISPs have a disconnect between Customers and Management.

    1. Riku

      Re: Columbia Internet for Canuks?

      When I worked at Earthlight back in NZ, we loved this strip and used to wonder where Illiad had hidden the cameras - many of the conversations and support calls were so close to our daily reality!

    2. ccomley

      Re: Columbia Internet for Canuks?

      Userfriendly is on our daily reading list here. As is Dilbert.

  9. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Demon

    Demon was long ago a nerd's ISP. Then it was taken over by Thus - (and now Vodafone).

    However they seem to have offloaded the obviously domestic services to Thus with limited hours overseas call centres.

    Their "business" services are moderately priced and always come with a fixed IPv4 address. The 24x7(?) call centre is in the UK. Possibly by coincidence the reliability of my home ADSL improved dramatically after switching to a BusinessLite contract. The recent long break was the first for many years. The download cap is 60gb a month - but transfers in the wee hours are not counted. For a few pounds more you can have "unlimited".

    They lost their mail "push" facility a while ago. They used to filter web traffic - possibly using the Internet Watch blacklist which often appeared to block perfectly innocent sites. Since switching to the "business" contract there have been no "blocked" messages. Possibly the filter is more selective or they don't have one - or possibly I don't link hop so randomly these days.

    They are not perfect - but just balancing on the right side so far for my needs.

    1. Gary Heard

      Re: Demon

      I remeber Demon in the old days swinging from great service to crap to good again as the servers and lines were improved. Was still with them until Thus just destroyed them.

      Since then have both my phone and BB with ICUK, they aren't perfect, but they helped me resolve a problem in the BT (Tier 1) exhange that ended with the DSLAM being changed to something modern and, I think, speeded the change from 20 to 21CN. Just waiting for my "Superfast BB" now, programmed for March -- we shall see

  10. Andy Livingstone

    White mice running round a wheel

    The BT monopoly called Market 1 is still the sole choice of many.

    1. Nigel Whitfield.

      Re: White mice running round a wheel

      Yep; and around 10-15% of people may be connected to 20CN rather than 21CN.

      However, while in a Market 1 exchange you may still have to rely on BT wholesale for the DSL link, that doesn't mean you can't go with some of these ISPs. You may be limited in terms of speed (especially on 20CN) and companies rely on the LLU offerings from C&W or TalkTalk are out, but you should still be able to find someone who can offer you a more customised service, even in Market 1, than if you simply take the BT option.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Market 1 options include AAISP, Zen, and others in between

        Market 1 options include AAISP, Zen, and others in between.

    2. ccomley

      Re: White mice running round a wheel

      Yes and no.

      Yes, there are still many Market 1 exchanges, that means, as you say, you can only buy your internet service supplied via BT's core network.

      But that does NOT mean you have to buy it from BT.

      You still have the choice of which ISP you go to for your retail service.

      You can't magically get CN21 or FTTC where the exchange only offers CN20 that way.

      But you do choose how your bandwidth is managed, packaged, and supported that way. And you also get to move your phone line away from BT if you want to - that can save you a small fortune. :)

      Buying a "resold" BT circuit cuts BT's *retail* operation out of the loop, sales, and support. Yes, your traffic still needs to run over BT's core network and yes, any fault in that network will still affect you as well as all your neighbours, but you can get better service in all other regards.

  11. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Entanet

    I switched from AAISP to Entanet purely because I needed unlimited usage. I stream backups from the office ...

    AA were excellent - great support and fully transparent about what was going on. Very knowledgeable staff. A fully routed connection with /29 IPv4 and a /48 IPv6, no questions asked. They gave my office connection a /27!

    Entanet: support not quite so good as AA but still responsive. /29 or /28 IPv4 is a one off payment of a few quid, /64 IPv6 as standard. 80/20 FTTC fully unlimited ie over a TB on occasions - £28 pm. Admittedly I am the reseller (so I don't actually pay quite that much) but even so it will be of that order for an end consumer. I note that the best Wizards will do is £150 pm at 40/10.

Page:

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon