Maybe it's just me.. but a lawyer as the president of a software company just doesn't seem quite right. Given that it's MS and they've tossed more than a few sueballs in their past, maybe makes it sense. Could it be that there are there new sueballs in their future?
Donald Trump? No, it's BRAD SMITH for president (of Microsoft)
Microsoft top legal beagle Brad Smith has been promoted to president of the company, marking the first time Redmond has had a company-wide president since 2002. Smith's expanded role also sees him taking the title of chief legal officer, an upgrade from his previous position as Microsoft's general counsel. In an internal memo …
COMMENTS
-
-
Saturday 12th September 2015 04:56 GMT PhilipN
Business and Lawyers
Do not mix. The way a lawyer thinks is entirely different from and incompatible with business decision-making. I AM a lawyer but have been fortunate enough to witness the pure businessman in action umpteen times and he was always the smart one.
For example invariably compromising instead of wasting time, money and other resources fighting. Fix Problem A at minimum cost and move on to make the next dollar. Overall a winning strategy.
Definitely do not fight for the sake of fighting, which is what lawyers are genetically predisposed to do whether it is a court battle or negotiating a deal or a document.
Lawyer as President is ok as long as he is ring-fenced and not permitted a disproportionate influence over strategic decisions.
Amen.
-
Saturday 12th September 2015 07:31 GMT Anonymous Coward
"People won't use technology they don't trust," Smith said. "And so for us, it's an imperative as a company that we put trust at the core of technology."
...so they turned their OS into a surveillance device. If they are going to have "trust" as a core value, a good start would be to look up what it means.
-
Saturday 12th September 2015 08:43 GMT Anonymous Coward
Haven't you noticed the nauseatingly contrived babies-and-windows-x-are-our-future ad campaign? Or the equally nauseatingly contrived ms-loves-privacy-and-we-never-slip-any-of-anyone's-data-to-the-
NUSA-honest-look-we're-even-defending-drugdealers-in-court-it's-the-principle-of-it ad campaign?I have! I know MSFT is awesome now. Proper, bona fide, kissing babies while defending us from evil, professional politician levels of awesome.
...and doubtless it's only just begun.
-
Saturday 12th September 2015 10:47 GMT Anonymous Coward
Haven't you noticed the nauseatingly contrived babies-and-windows-x-are-our-future ad campaign?
.. and the clear parallels with how Google operates? It is as if they're sharing notes. MS from what it has managed to get away with in the past, Google's notes about subverting whole generations to make them think that privacy no longer matters as long as you get stuff for "free".
-
-
-
-
Saturday 12th September 2015 09:10 GMT P. Lee
Re: Trusted computing
The idea of a lawyer in command seems absurd... however its difficult to know if it a weasel move or a recognition by the BoD that the Windows 10 snooping thing is way out of control and while they can probably cope with consumer irritation and rebellion, dealing with corporate customers is a whole different ball of wax.
MS isn't a dying company. I'm just amazed that it constantly manages to make itself look like one.
+1 for the "why the creepy W10 ads?" Buy Windows 10 (don't think about it, just look at the cute baby! Awwww!)
Pssst! MS! I have this plan I got from Coke for managing a transition to a new product. Oh... you've already got it? Now I understand.
-
This post has been deleted by its author
-
-