"The council is re-locating a data centre"
Which council? Solihull? Are you padding out a very short story with quotes from a previous one?
Southend-on-Sea Borough Council is the latest local authority to build its own dedicated data centre, with the council ready to spend up to £1.5m housing its own "hybrid cloud" services. The council said it is looking to appoint a provider to supply, install, and test the new data centre. The contract lasts for three years and …
Some things I host externally, some things I run locally in my own DC. Key drivers are cost, quality and reliability. Comms links are way more likely to fail than the suppressant being triggered in the DC. Even with the dual redundant WAN links I have had more comms failures than DC failures in the last 5 years. Commodity stuff I will host/use cloud (e.g. email, office), business specific stuff (e.g. systems of record, finance, hr etc) I will keep on premise with suitable off site data backups. People can usually live without email for a few hours (we have a in house phone switch, none of your cloudy nonsense), but living without customer records for more than 10 minutes is fairly bad.Just to be sure, I have two DCs 700m apart with generator backup. You know it makes sense.
It is probably but not certain that they are using the same comms and power just because they're only 700m apart. I've seen completely independent systems which are only 5m apart and designed to withstand a bomb going off in each other.
I accept that it is more common for them to be a few miles apart.
I got a dirty look when I pointed this out to our IT management, it's my job as infosec bod.
In my case the conversation went something like this..
"Look guys, I'm just saying two datacentres in the same building, 500m apart isn't really segregation. We should be using the buildings in (insert town) or even (insert other town) as we have two gig connections to them."
Response:
"Yeah but we've already installed the servers in these two. So no."
Ah fudge it.
Lets hope this creates some directly employed roles in both local councils. Outsourcing day to day data centre tasks to external providers delivers scalability but it also generously throws wads of taxpayers' money straight into the pockets of those who own those companies for doing pretty much damn all themselves..
In house or cloud are not the only choices though. Traditional colocation is both considerably cheaper and far more reliable than an in house DC.
I don't know how much computing power Southend Council think they need but even 500 hefty servers would only just reach £1m over 10years!
To be fair we have enough empty office space in Southend from ex-HMRC buildings and old bank offices to be able to build a big Data Centre - even one with excellent ventilation (CE Heath House, anyone.)
Grumble grumble, council tax increasing, grumble grumble, spend it on roundabouts etc etc etc...
This post has been deleted by its author
Err, (to use your title) isn't Gcloud is a procurement framework not a data centre or hosting service? The Ojeu tender that Southend seem to have had on their website includes everyone (including those on Gcloud) and allows local business to bid too. Same point really "Erlang Lacod" made. That should boost the locally economy rather than the multi nationals..
....Or do you mean they should host EVERYTHING out through vendors on the Gcloud, like social care data and nhs numbers? Would Southend people consent to this being uploaded into a gcloud vendor? What if it's more expensive like "localzuk" says to do so. I personally would hope they do indeed spend money on keeping this data safe and onsite rather than put it on amazon or google or where nobody knows where it is! Maybe it's GCloud for somethings On-site for others.
...Or do you mean they should be like Glasgow and not put any money into onsite items?
I've worked for local government as a contractor before and looks like they're doing a good job looking at a digital strategy. What's the alternative.....Council puts data out onto cloud and can't find it or it costs too much http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/02/02/hey_amazon_why_so_expensive_for_sql_server/ . Did you contact them to find out details before you printed the article - would like to have seen more of an article on it and what they're doing? Wish the Council I worked at had such a detailed plan to deal with all the changes happening with technology and data security. Bring on a Digital Pier to spice up your picture! Is there a right way or a wrong way for local authorities at the moment.
Seems like they get bashed either way.
Where's the seagull ? Someone changed the picture. I'm sure thats now the backdrop where Arthur Daley used to saunter off our screens at the end of Minder.
It is certainly positive to see a local authority running their own DC on their own premises.
What I know about UK local authority finance could probably be printed nicely on the back of a postage stamp in 16 pitch font but I guess I'd like to see a bit of detail around this to show viability.
Councils are having their budgets painfully squeezed by Central government still, so with year on year cuts the norm can they afford this ? Have they thought about consolidating services with another local authority ? Will it create new jobs or cause redundancies as a scramble to reduce paper headcount ? And indeed will Arthur Daley be taking care of the data migration..