back to article Brocade broadcasts financial success. Well, if you call an 89% profit drop 'success'

Helped by two months of Ruckus Wireless ownership, Brocade's revenues for the third quarter of fiscal year 2016 were up seven per cent annually to $591m, a 13 per cent quarter-on-quarter increase. The company posted profits of a paltry $10.5m, 89 per cent down on the year-ago quarter's $91.7m, and 23.3 per cent less than the …

  1. Danny 14

    Brocade simply have nothing that i want. 10g iscsi is cheaper than licensing FC through brocade.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Cheaper, definitely. If you are pushing some serious transfer rates, like a huge back up, FC is better. If you are just doing low fairly low intensity r/w I/O for a web application or whatever, it probably doesn't make much of a difference as both IP and FC are moving data at the speed of light and the disk is going to bottleneck either of them.... Most people would probably be better off buy cheap iSCSI or other IP switches for most workloads and spending their cash on more expensive SSD storage instead of disk, which will make a performance difference... or just skipping the SAN altogether and buying a hypercoverged system, or letting Google Cloud or AWS figure it out for you.

  2. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    It seems like Brocade's demise has been projected every year for many years... but people apparently keep buying those traditional SAN systems.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like