Post: Multiple reboots?
Multiple reboots? →
Posted Monday 14th January 2008 23:14 GMT
In Latest Vista SP1 tweak open to everyone with a week to spare
Are you serious?
It's bad enough that windows update "sometimes" (ie usually) requires a reboot. Its unacceptable that it "sometimes" (ie frequently) does a reboot, even though you've told it not to reboot and/or that it persistently nags you if you persistently say NO NOT YET and then does it the moment you turn your back, despite the fact there are important jobs running which can't be interrupted.
However, multiple reboots -- that's just plain STUPIDER THAN STUPID and INCOMPETENTER THAN INCOMPENTENT.
I'll say this just once.
BILL GATES, ITS HIGH TIME YOU RESIGNED AND WERE REPLACED BY SOMEBODY THAT UNDERSTANDS HOW TO DESIGN MAINTAINABLE SYSTEMS THAT *D*O*N*T* NEED REBOOTING EVERY FIVE MINUTES, or better still don't require rebooting at all -- and above all, never ever without the user's permission.
Did you hear that ? Well, did you?
And if you don't understand WHY the above is necessary, then its definitely high time you went.
Most read
Popular Whitepapers
- Systems management simplified
Guided tour: Dell Management Console - Virtualization with the Intel Xeon Processor 5500 Series
A proof of concept - Total cost of ownership of Dell, HP and IBM blade solutions
A comparison conducted by Principled Technologies - A Cure for Server Sprawl
Dell Global Infrastucture Consulting helps DeKalb Medical - Optimizing the data center for cost and efficiency
Control costs and add value to the business - Real-world server consolidation with Hyper-V
35 HP ProLiant DL385 servers onto 5 Dell PowerEdge M610 blade servers running Hyper-V