Post: Re: Should have just kept developing Xenix
Re: Should have just kept developing Xenix →
Posted Friday 15th February 2008 09:26 GMT
In SCO bags $100m to fight another day
No, please no. Not Xenix. Horrible, horrible, HORRIBLE pile of pants. How Microsoft thought Unix should work. Xenix should be paraded to all Linux fanboiz as an Awful Warning of what could happen if Redmond ever tries to "embrace" [sic(k)] Linux.
SCO Unix OTOH was a very nice operating system. Back in 1994 my Internet connection was installed on an elderly 386 (ask yer parents, young 'uns) running it. And it worked very well indeed.
Most read
Popular Whitepapers
- Staying committed to server refresh reduces cost
Can a server refresh help your company? - Business Ready Configurations for Virtualization
A Solution Guide - A Smart Path to Virtualization
Virtualization and Flexible Computing - Optimizing the data center for cost and efficiency
Control costs and add value to the business - Real-world server consolidation with Hyper-V
35 HP ProLiant DL385 servers onto 5 Dell PowerEdge M610 blade servers running Hyper-V - Thermal design of Dell PowerEdge server
T610, R610 and R710
