The Channel logo
Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

input from a Pharma IT worker...

I work for a top Pharma (not Pfizer), and It's my job to deal with these things. Some points:

1) It wan't the worker, but the worker's *spouse.* Screwup #1 - letting unauthorized persons use the hardware. You DON'T do that.

2) Installing unauthorized software. Screwup #2 - leaving the system open for untrusted persons (like end-user) able to instal software. Only trusted, authorised persons should be able to install software.

3) Laptops have valid use, even for high-security work. People want better drugs for free. This puts pressure on the company to get increased cost/performance. That means Pharmas must cut costs. That means (among other things) fewer staff (my company is cutting many hundreds IT workers, for instance), and remaining staff working longer hours. Rather than work overtime at the office, they take their work home with them, on laptops. This reduces resentment, and increases retention of remaining staff.

It's not the laptop, it's the lack of security on the laptop, and the security breach by the authorised worker, in allowing an unauthorized user access.

Forums

Forgotten password

Opinion

euros_channel_money

Tim Worstall

Time to take a sniff at the coffee, perhaps
joe_tucci_emc_channel

Chris Mellor

Will they have to drag him back like last time?
chain_relationship_channel

Features

cloud_accounting
Playing the SLA long game
channel_teaser_money_top
cloud computing Fight
Applications must work for the cloud to float
Paul Cormier, Red Hat
How a Unix killer crawled from the dot-com bust