Post: Bad for the internet?
Bad for the internet? →
Posted Friday 6th June 2008 09:57 GMT
In 'Legit' website compromises reach epidemic proportions
Well if this is bad because of noscript being required to be safe and the use stopping ads from getting to the eyeballs, how much worse is Phorm replacing mid-stream the adverts the site is expecting to hand off and replacing them with ones BT and Phorm are selling?
If you're not going to get the ads the site needs to keep going no matter what you do, why not ban all ads? No loss to the site, after all: the ads were being blocked by BT.
Most read
Popular Whitepapers
- A Smart Path to Virtualization
Virtualization and Flexible Computing - Real-world server consolidation with Hyper-V
35 HP ProLiant DL385 servers onto 5 Dell PowerEdge M610 blade servers running Hyper-V - Business-Critical Applications
The Benefits of Intel Xeon Processors and Windows Server 2008 R2 for Business-Critical Apps - Virtualize at the speed of your business
The Dell guide to virtualization - A Cure for Server Sprawl
Dell Global Infrastucture Consulting helps DeKalb Medical - Staying committed to server refresh reduces cost
Can a server refresh help your company?