Post: What about home users?
What about home users? →
Posted Wednesday 27th June 2007 11:38 GMT
In The decline of antivirus and the rise of whitelisting
A lot of the comments here pretty much seem to deal with the corporate environment, which is fine and afterall, does need protecting. But what about the home users? They can't wait around for someone with specific admin access to come along and whitelist the programs they want. They are the admin themselves.
As always the home users are the ones who are going to be the big problem here. More often than not, they are the God of their own computer, regardless of how much actual knowledge they have and they're the ones propogating the mass of virii.
All these solutions seem to do is take a large database of known quantities and let users interrogate it in one form or another. In a real home environment these options aren't really practical. The only reason AV vendors get away with it is because as older virii drop out of use they get dropped from the database to keep the size down. Then they get reinstated if there's a new outbreak.
Most read
Popular Whitepapers
- Business-Critical Applications
The Benefits of Intel Xeon Processors and Windows Server 2008 R2 for Business-Critical Apps - Data Center Savings
Realizing Data Center Savings with an Accelerated Server Refresh Strategy - Virtualization with the Intel Xeon Processor 5500 Series
A proof of concept - The Great Virtualization Dilemma of the Next Decade
What You Need to Know - Out-of-box comparison between Dell, HP, and IBM blade servers
Receiving, unpacking and installing each system in the server rack - Real-world server consolidation with VMware vSphere 4
35 HP ProLiant DL385 servers onto 5 Dell PowerEdge M610 blade servers with VMware vSphere