Post: @ Kev K
@ Kev K →
Posted Tuesday 9th June 2009 08:55 GMT
In Webhost hack wipes out data for 100,000 sites
A backup on a second raid disk is great in all intents and purposes but I'd say for that extra bit of security a backup on a completely different machine at a different location maybe even with a different provider would be a good thing.
I keep occasionally badgering one of my customers I support about their backups. They have a server with RAID disks which they backup but the backup never goes off site because they only have one backup drive. No matter how much I tell them that they need AT LEAST one other backup drive so they can alternate the drives and have an off-site backup it just falls on deaf ears because they won't spend the money on a bog standard USB hard drive (they don't have much data, easily under 160GB!).
Rob
Most read
Popular Whitepapers
- Business-Critical Applications
The Benefits of Intel Xeon Processors and Windows Server 2008 R2 for Business-Critical Apps - Data Center Savings
Realizing Data Center Savings with an Accelerated Server Refresh Strategy - Virtualization with the Intel Xeon Processor 5500 Series
A proof of concept - The Great Virtualization Dilemma of the Next Decade
What You Need to Know - Out-of-box comparison between Dell, HP, and IBM blade servers
Receiving, unpacking and installing each system in the server rack - Real-world server consolidation with VMware vSphere 4
35 HP ProLiant DL385 servers onto 5 Dell PowerEdge M610 blade servers with VMware vSphere