Post: back to the matter of the article
back to the matter of the article →
Posted Monday 17th September 2007 18:10 GMT
In Google gloats over ISO's OOXML rejection
M$ will not 'learn' from this episode; they have a "perverse economic incentive" (thanks to Bruce Schneier for that piece of terminology) NOT to adhere to truly open standards and to do their utmost to impose their kludgeware on the World.
The entire M$ ethos is to sell their wares based not on their technical merit, rather on their ease-of-use; to the vast majority of end users, the underlying technology is uttterly irrelevant.
I do not intend the foregoing statements to mean that all efforts to prevent any M$ 'technology' being adopted as any standard may as well be adandoned - the fight must go on!
Most read
Popular Whitepapers
- A Smart Path to Virtualization
Virtualization and Flexible Computing - Selecting Server Processors to Reduce Total Cost
Intel Xeon processors based on Nehalem can significantly enhance server performance - Real-world server consolidation with Hyper-V
35 HP ProLiant DL385 servers onto 5 Dell PowerEdge M610 blade servers running Hyper-V - A Cure for Server Sprawl
Dell Global Infrastucture Consulting helps DeKalb Medical - Systems management simplified
Guided tour: Dell Management Console - Business-Critical Applications
The Benefits of Intel Xeon Processors and Windows Server 2008 R2 for Business-Critical Apps