@ryan, morley, marco, mademoiselle, and Barry
here here..
5 posts • joined Wednesday 17th October 2007 11:55 GMT
No, mr "brake" ... i took my CBR to 165, and yes, it was fun! was it dangerous.. no...
the time i was doing 30 and the white van man pulled in front of me without indicating or looking in his mirrors let alone his blind spot, now THAT hurt MUCH more than doing 165...
while everything else in the world gets faster, why don't speed limits keep up? it's because of the stupid idiots who can't drive properly! sort your act out mr DSA! (i suggest a test every 5/10 years!)
speed doesn't kill, it's the tosser who makes a move causing rapid decelleration from that speed!
grrr
ok, so this or that can be MORE dangerous than something else, SO!
setting all speed limits to 10mph would make the country MUCH safer, or better still, BAN cars! but we all know that's proposterous. as humans we can tolerate a certain level of risk, why do officials try and curb this?
as for being distracted, what about a mother with a baby in the car who's crying or doing something, don't you think that would be worse than using a phone?
so in conclusion, either kids or cars have to go... because they aren't safe!!
Why did he buy it then if he didn't want windows?
I don't but an elise and then sue lotus for not giving me an option for having four seats. it's a bloody two seater car, just as it's a laptop with windows installed. if you don't want a two seater car, don't buy an elise, if you don't want windows, don't buy that HP!
spoon!
when i ride my bike on the motorway at 76mph, in the dark, in icy conditions, changing lanes in heavy traffic over those nice bumpy cat's eyes... absoloutly stark bollock naked.. i'm actually riding perfectly legally..
funny how the law considers this safe, but then considers 26mph dangersous in good visibility, on a deserted road, on a dry day, with 4 wheels, wearing a crash helmet and full body armour.. dangerous
preposterous!!!