Re: This is a real problem....
Think of it as a gift .....
121 publicly visible posts • joined 18 Oct 2007
.. to invent the AI bot subscription at a cost of a few million $ per year.
Would bring them more money than paying the lawyers for what will no doubt be perceived as detrimental in the long run.
I mean, does the NYT actively not want to have any influence over the future ? Or prefer to leave it to the likes of antisocial media ?
And the museum is fabulous and an unmissable visit when in Stockholm .... https://www.vasamuseet.se/en
But was generally not good for the server : Doom as a tool for system administration
There comes a point in time when you have to announce to people that their technology has gone to the other side and they have no choice but to renew. Even if it's not quite true, but just to keep your sanity ...
If only it were equally simple with central heating ....
Outlook is available on the Mac.
And it's an even bigger piece of crap than the Windows version, despite having been around for over 15 years ... so I wouldn't get your hopes up.
Thankfully Microsoft does (or did) a version of Office without Outlook that they charge less for ...
Sure, they want to run a business like lots of other people.
But being shat on by bigger unrestrained monopolistic companies with can make that difficult.
Was software patenting the right way to go ? Probably not, but what other effective avenues were available ?
The patent world of the 60s is not the patent world of today.
As a kid I remember the Concorde maiden flight from Tolouse. Followed not much later by the humungous - at the time - launch of the 747. It was a great time for planes :-)
There is also a Concorde at the Seattle Museum of Flight at Boeing Field, that you can walk through. And as you say it's tiny. In addition there is also a walk through of a previous version of Air Force One - maybe 707 based - I don't remember - someone will tell me.
All in all a great place to go - a whole day will not be enough.
And if you're there, the visit to Boeing at Everett is just awesome, a cathedral of engineering prowess.
Though I guess there are no more 747s
Tastefully decked out with demotivational posters from despair.com …..
Crazy, the distance is ~650km.
A current high speed train could do that in 3 hours - competitive with the plane given all the faffing around at airports as you point out.
And with a much higher density of around 800 to 1000 passengers per train.
And a much higher frequency - you can do at least 4 trains per hour if not more.
Not forgetting the added bonus of not being in a plane.
However, an overnight sleeper does have its charms, though usually at a price.
Ha ! I remember those - I was an undergrad there at the time.
They turned up from the Science Research Council (before Engineering crept in) and were followed by a couple Sun-1 workstations and a Sirius PC.
I think they were originally billed as Smalltalk machines though I am not sure how they ended up after ICL got to them. Though it could be that the Computer Science department wanted them for other stuff than other users …
The 68000 is just a more-or-less revamped PDP-11, though this is not to belittle it, as the PDP-11 is one of the greatest (if not the greatest) CPU designs ever IMHO.
The 68000 hit the streets in 1981/2 which was already behind Intel’s 8086/8 which had started coming on stream at the end of the 70’s and were therefore more widespread.
It’s a shame, as the Intel legacy has been, and continues to be, such a millstone that nobody can get rid of. Intel tried twice, once with iAXP32 and the again with Itanium. Both failed miserably having cost huge amounts.
Worse still the i86 family didn’t get any better until the 386. The 186 was the all in one system on a chip that should have been the obvious choice for building PCs, but it was as flawed as the 286 which IBM did use in its PC-AT. It’s virtual memory model was broken and only fixed to become usable in the 386 - the days of memory extenders were finally over.
But by that time the software investment was too great to switch - only the non MS world could take advantage of better processors or build their own - Apple, Apollo, Sun, Stratus, Tandem, Perq to name but a few, now all fallen by the wayside.
Although the 68000 did have a proper virtual memory co-chip its arrival was too late to stem the wave of the IBM PC and its clones.
The path to hell is paved with good intentions …
Proper computer science is just a specialised branch of maths :-)
The Donald showed us that.
Do students still study things like Taylor series and numerical and operational analysis, or have we consigned them to ‘just include this library’ ?
However, maths is not enough if you actually want to build a computer as engineering ≠ maths.
A fully fledged FORTH implementation does everything including its own disk I/O.
I wrote a FORTH interpreter/compiler whatever you call it for the 8086 in assembler and it came in at under 8KB - which at the time was a big plus when memory was more expensive than programmers.
FORTH - quirky definitely, elegant yes in lots of places, but maintainable, usable .... not so sure :)
You don't need object oriented FORTRAN, or ever will .... as we knew in 1982
"The market for this was big enough that several companies were making dedicated versions of this chip with the Basic interpreter masked into ROM on the chip itself...."
Hey that was me - for one of them at least !
Cramming a Tiny BASIC interpreter coded into 4K of ROM on an 8051 in 1982. Took me a week to reorganise my assembly code to get down from 4099 bytes to 4095 in the end.... those were the days
Sauerkraut and Rhineland wines are wonderful .. sounds like you just haven’t experienced good ones.
As for aristocracy the choices are limited - Hapsburgs, Bourbons, Glukcksbergs who are all related anyway, so hardly specifically German or a choice.
And then there are Messrs Hilbert, Reinmann, Gödel, Gauss, Krebs and Koch, to name but a few...
FFS read some history and at least get the basic facts correct
The Conservative Prime Minister, Edward Heath, took the UK into the EEC in January 1973.
The referendum of 1975, under Wislon's government, who backed leave, was whether or not to continue to stay in Europe.
The electorate expressed significant support for EC membership, with 67% in favour on a national turnout of 64%.
The referendum result was not legally binding - because referenda / ums are not, they are public opinion polls to assist parliament - however, it was widely accepted that the vote would be politically binding on future Westminster Parliaments.