Of course, anyone that works in the industry already knows that trying to get engineers to work together is like herding cats....

I guess they're not working as a team because either they don't want to or they haven't been taught how.

Haha. I'd forgotten all about him! Thank you for brightening up my day.

Everyone will just switch to consoles in the end to avoid the hassle of DRM. This kind of bad thinking will be the death of the PC gaming market.

I've had loads of problems with securom games in the past because my Philips drive meets the CD spec (cos Philips wrote it) and the secrurom games don't. Playing anything on PC usually involves a deterring amount of faffage.

They need to make games easier to install and play, that way people will pay money and buy them. Simple isn't it?

I don't like the idea of an extended tit for tat exchange between the bot masters and the bot exterminators played out on my machine. This could get messy. Expecially when the next logical step in the arms race is to deliberately make attempted removal of the bot more damaging than leaving it be.

Best to contact the users concerned. They'll need to get involved in order to patch the vunerability that got them infected in the first place.

It's good practice when setting up a business to check out the current usage of any domains you might be interested in. Usually before you've settled on a name. There's no point in starting a business called Amazon, for example.

Choosing something that's already in use and then getting uppity about it a few years later is just a bit daft. Even Paris knows better.

Huh? How can you be responsible for content that's on someone else's site? What happens if they change the content from legal to not legal while you're not looking? What happens if someone hacks the site and changes the contents?

Sounds like a rubbish law to me. The link is just a reference. Referencing other works on paper doesn't cause a problem, so why on the web?

I've had a love/hate relationship with Creative kit over the years. The hardware itself is very good quality. I love my Audigy Platinum, but the drivers have always been second rate and badly supported.

I've not been planning to buy any more Creative gear since a few years ago, but I might consider it if they make Daniel_K the head of driver development.

I've never understood hardware manufacturers attitudes to people writing their own open source drivers. There's a huge number of talented developers out there that would happily debug and fix any open source drivers if they existed, for free! But no, "any information about how the hardware works is our property and you ain't having it!" It was a real pig of a job writing an nVidia driver by reverse engineering the Linux driver, which was itself reverse engineered from the Windows one!

I don't like the typical "that isn't going to happen" response from the banks, but ifthey admitted fault then I guess they would then be liable for the costs of any fraud. At the moment, if you're a victim of one of these attacks, the bank will just deny that it's possible and not compensate you...."you must have given your PIN away."

The technical report on their blog is worth a read. These guys seem to know what they're doing, and had rather too much fun doing it! Figure 14 is a classic!

I'm no space expert, but wouldn't the positioning of the moon affect the trajectory of the satellite? The timing is such that the moon being directly opposite would bring the satellite closer to the Earth around the point where they're going to shoot at it.

I do remember a ground based laser system for shooting down satellites. I liked the way it was mounted on a fast moving anti-aircraft style mounting. Just what you need for shooting down fast moving low altitude targets like... erm... satellites.