To me, it sounds rather more like Aperture Science.
Posts by Jonathan White
212 posts • joined Tuesday 1st April 2008 09:48 GMT
What, you mean Apple won't let him push his scareware on a platform with no legitimate security threat (well, other than from Apple itself)? They won't let him browbeat people into buying something which is functionally useless?
Shame on them.
I have a feeling every change Apple makes to any product for about the next... say five years maybe, some useless hack will spout up 'they can do this now Steve Jobs is dead, because he vetoed it when he was alive'.
5" iPhone - only possible now Steve is dead
7" iPad - only possible now Steve is dead
'close' button a slightly different shade of red - only possible now Steve is dead
'You’ve launched a handset or two with a new operating system and they’ve gone down quite well.'
Really? Really? I suppose they've gone down quite well if you assume 'going down quite well' does not include 'any large number of people actually paying money for them'.
Re: Makes you think though...
'Nobody cares that this technology can (and will) be used in WMD's'.
You're right, nobody cares. But then when (from that perspective) the story is 'country which already has ICBMS that can kill anyone anywhere on the planet in minutes tests new rocket which is slightly slower and shorter range' they're not exactly likely to are they?
Jesus.
I've had more WD drives fail on me than every other manufacturer put together. Meh.
'Apple may be considering an end to the production of 17in desktop-replacement laptops, but Samsung isn't. '
Of course not, it's got to wait for Apple to do it first, prove it actually makes money to do so and then Samsung can do it while claiming it was their idea all along.
Jon
Re: the shape of things to come?
Quite so. Evidence suggests trading with China is pretty much giving away your IP whether you planned to or not.
A wise man said 'sometimes the only way to win the war is not to fight the battle'. You can forgo the profit of trade with China but keep your IP, or you can trade with them for short-term profit and they will end up eating your lunch. Guess which choice most western company executives will go for?
Jon
Actually, they patently did do a trademark search outside the US and paid the people who the report said had the trademark a big wodge of cash. Just the people who the report said had the trademark (apparently) didn't actually have it, someone else in the company did. And they fell out with the first bunch.
If things had been as cut & dried as you seem to believe they were, it wouldn't have wrangled on for months on end.
One thing does make me laugh though - 'Yan Xiaohong, the deputy director of China's National Copyright Administration'
China has a National Copyright Administration? That must be the cushiest job ever....
Some of us who are now in the 'have you tried switching it off and on again' brigade probably started down that path by making some pocket money on the side fixing friend's spectrum keyboard when the contacts underneath the rubber failed, as they did quite often (especially wasz, for obvious reasons). Pop the top off, replace the weird membraney thing with all the switches in. IIRC you could get them for a quid or so, and I used to charge a fiver for the job...
Jon
'With such high demand,"
For 26" TV? AT £449? You sure about that?
"Whether these options are available, and the details of how they work, may vary by retailer and by title."
In other words, it's a nice idea which the content providers will then do everything possible to f!ck up.
'Fail' because there isn't an 'almost certainly going to be fail' tag.
'The same daily routine that sees my Desire HD need a top-up every 12 hours saw the One X needing the same,'
Having to charge every day = fail, regardless of anything else a phone can do or who makes it.
And, as an observation, if HTC's problem is 2011 was releasing too many phones, I don't see how carrying on doing the same thing in 2012 just this time giving them really really similar names is going to make help.
Nice to see El Reg forums maintaining their usual standards...
For anyone interested, instructions on checking for and removing the malware are here :-
http://www.f-secure.com/v-descs/trojan-downloader_osx_flashback_i.shtml
The only observation I would make is that, of the number of active OSX computers in use (given the sales of OS updates & etc), 500,000 is actually quite a small percentage. So they've got off lightly, basically.
Re: Security banned!
Then surely the solution is obvious - don't let them store sensitive information on their phone/tablet. Have proper security policies and enforce them both by technological means and by judicious use of the cattleprod.
'Especially since the new model delivers not a jot more peformance than the old one.'
From your geekbench screenshots, it seems to me it does provide about a jot more's performance. Not much more than that though...
(From the OED
Jot - noun
[usually with negative]
a very small amount:)
It's not really 'the only game in town' at all. Lacie do a thunderbolt SSD external drive as well (which has two ports, although I'm not sure how much juice it can pass on) and, although not officially on sale in the UK yet, you can grab Seagate's Thunderbolt adapter for it's goflex mobile drives on Amazon, although IIRC there isn't an SSD goflex drive yet. But you can get a 7200 1TB drive and I suspect that'll be quick enough for most people.
Plenty of choice to be had and, frankly, Elgato's offering is far from the best. Wish they'd give up faffing about with iPhone gadgets and external drives and fix some of the age-old problems with their EyeTV kit, tbh.
What the adage - "It's easier to sell people a lie if it's one they dearly wish was true."
On the whole 'hand it off to IT and tell them to make it work' line, where I work we have an extensive list of supported hardware and software on the company intranet. It gets updated often (you have to with mobile devices) and company policy is very clear : If you buy something that's not on that list, you're on your own. We can and have refused to support eejit managers who bought something that wasn't on the list but 'looked cool' and then didn't have a clue how to actually make it work.
We back this up with hard numbers that show that if we're fixing some accountard's random chinese knock off smartphone, we're not doing the things that actually help the company make money (or could cost it money some time in the future).
To be fair, we're pretty proactive about trying to keep up with what people want and if they want something unusual, most of the management know they can come to us as we'll work with them on it. It's give and take, basically. But we don't have much 'shadow IT' as a result.
A lot of hotels I've been in with ethernet require some sort of web-based auth by the connecting device before they will route any traffic. How does this device deal with that? I've tried the same 'job' with an Apple airport express and it failed due to the device not being able to auth to the hotels service. I assume if you had a laptop to do the auth you could do some level of MAC address spoofing maybe but that's hardly 'plug and play' is it?
Re: Or
True enough, if running Windows is a viable choice in the particular circumstance. However it might be nice if we had at least one thread that didn't turn into the usual 'Mac vs Windows' tediumfest,
If they wanted to stick to the Mac OS world, they could buy a cheaper Air, use the SSD as a pure boot drive and buy one of the various Thunderbolt mobile drives that seem to be finally popping up. Another thing to carry around (although probably still less weight than a Pro overall) and certainly faster than the Pro's built in drive.
There are always options. And there is certainly not One True Way, whether it comes from Cupertino or Redmond.
Lazy?Yeah, I suppose so. After all, all they've changed is the touchscreen, the CPU, the GPU, the camera, the cellular modem and the battery. Imagine what else they could have changed if they hadn't been so lazy eh?
All in a 'what have the Romans ever done for us' voice, of course.
'alas no USB charging'
"Fair play to ViewSonic for being honest about the 2,700mAh power pack only offering around 5.5 hours and, indeed, between four and five hours is all you can expect. Loop a 720p video and the lights go out at just over the 3 hour mark."
The combination of these two factors makes for a massive fail. Who wants to carry ANOTHER wall wart around?
You do realise you're categorising Android users as a Barbarian Horde, right?
Re: Where's the money?
It's an interesting point - much like the smartphone market, it's very likely Apple won't give a flying fig about 'market share' as long as they carry on making a ton of money. They have an ecosystem which is probably big enough now to be self-sustaining for a decade, so while they may make lots of noise about 'killing Android', the reality is they're pretty much insulated from whatever Google might do by an enormously thick layer of money.
This is the same iTV/Apple TV that the same analysts have already told everyone would absolutely, certainly have been announced by now, yes?
IMO, analysts should have to wear a uniform. A clown's uniform.
I refer the honourable forum member to Hanlon's Razor.
Bloody hell.. first world problems or what? 'Look, look, the tiny indicator on my phone is saying a different sort of data connection that I've actually got. Oh the humanity!'
Seriously, this was worth a news story??
The movie plot you describe involving the X-47B is far too close to the movie 'Stealth' for my liking, and even Jessica Biel in a bikini couldn't save THAT pile of fetid dingo's kidneys.
Given some of the stuff I've seen people happily put up on them (both male and female) I'm not really able to quantify what would count as a 'gaffe'.
Plus, the fact that men are less private with their data is not necessarily a privacy mistake. Regretting something afterwards is not the same as not wanting to reveal it beforehand. I've done quite a lot of things I regretted later that were bloody excellent at the time!
Seems to me this survey started with a very particular hypothesis, then 'analysed' the data to prove it. I'm sure Ben Goldacre would have many things to say about it.
Re: Maybe I'm being naive, but...
Your suggestion would be valid if the point of chip & pin was to increase convenience or security to the customer. It isn't and never was. It's there to provide the banks with the 'default deniability of responsibility' they tried to foist on everyone when ATMs came in. The point is not to make life easy for you, it's so the banks can use the 'you must have given your PIN away so we're not responsible when all the money disappears from your account' excuse every time. They couldn't do that with cheques and signatures, because the world accepted that signatures can be forged.
Jon
SO let me get this straight.. they gave you the NHS Direct self-diagnosis app to review and the first thing you thought is 'how can I get a turn-on out of this'? Seriously? What are you, 13?
If I read the article correctly, it's a question of distinctions. There were roughly twice as many Android handsets than iOS handsets sold but because the sales of Android handsets were shared between several different manufacturers, none of those sold more smartphones than Apple did individually.
What numbers you're interested in depends on who you are. If I was interested in how much profit each company made, I'd be an investor. If I was interested in how many apps were sold on each platform, I'd be a developer. If I was interested in how many ads were seen on each platform, I'd be Google. If I was interested about how many handsets were sold with each platform running on them, I'd be a fanboy.
Jon
I kind of don't mind this - look, at least they'll have something in common. That's always a good thing, even if what they've got in common is a bit.. unusual.
Good luck to them I say. I'd rather the world was filled with people who want to get on, to whatever degree, than being filled with people whose main kick in life seems to be hurling insults at another group of people on the likes of the El Reg forums.
Would it be amiss to ask why this file was 'released'? Are the FBI in the habit of giving out a detailed history of investigations into prominent figures shortly after their death?
Man Alive.
A new Android phone with 2.2 in 2012.....
For someone called Lance you're not very sharp, are you? If they stopped Foxconn etc from shipping the products, that would cost Chinese business billions (they do actually get paid for building them you know. Even if they don't pass a lot of that money on to the poor sods on the production line) - probably more than any legal case could hope to bring in. I doubt very much if the PRC is dumb enough to basically entirely alienate a massive income stream for the sake of a piddling law suit. I'm sure there are plenty of other places who would be happy to welcome the likes of Apple, given they promise employment for tens of thousands of people and a huge influx of foreign currency.
iPads can be built in other places than China. Not immediately, and not as cheaply but they can. Foxconn don't have a monopoly on manufacturing. They're just the cheapest place. If they can't be used, they'll just got to the next cheapest.
Jon
If you need to use a designator, why not just get a bigger laser?
'We doubt that the same treatment will be extended to Apple's hundreds of thousands of contracted employees in China and Asia, who work long hours making devices for manufacturers such as Foxconn or Pegatron.'
Er... that would possibly be because they're not contracted to Apple, they're contracted to Foxconn or Pegatron?
Seriously Reg, is this the best you can do?
Love won't pay my bills, I want.. Money!
"You probably have enough cash swilling around to (almost) buy Samsung if you wanted it?"
Yeah, but why would they? Samsung aren't making anywhere near as much money selling phones as Apple are anyway. They'd be much better off using the money to invest internally.
As for
"Wall Street moneymen looking a wee bit silly"
Well, honestly? I think pretty much every day of there last three years has been doing that hasn't it?
Final thought - I haven't checked, but I bet there's a fair chance Apple's share price fell at this news.
small difference
The PS3 setup isn't freeview HD. Unless they finally got around to making a mark 2 playTV anyway. It's anice setup - the interface is way ahead of most PVRs - but without DVB-T2 decoding, it's old tech in the UK.
" interviewed over a hundred developers globally"
Representiative sampling : They've heard of it.
Um..
I think it's somewhat unlikely punters are going to jump at 802.11ac routers unless/until there's a sufficient groundswell of products which would connect to them. And we're not just talking about laptops with dongles any more - phones, tablets, media streamers, consoles, remote controls even. All stuff that uses B/G and or N, which isn't easily upgradeable like your average PC.
It's a bit chicken and the egg though - nobody will buy the routers without the clients and nobody will make clients until there's an established demand through people having routers.
As a bare minimum, the routers have to be backwards compatible and even then you're talking about several years of natural wastage of equipment before the new .ac compatible kit achieves critical mass. By which point of course home broadband will have moved on again...
Basically put, there needs to be something more than the 'ooh, shiny' about it for it to get adopted in anything less than geological time. I don't really hear a lot of people complaining about how their home wifi isn't speedy enough, and most people right now are too skint to think about upgrading their entire wifi setup for what may not immediately be an obvious benefit.
It strikes me a bit like 3D telly. Yes, at a technical level there is a USP there. But I think they're going to have a hard time convincing people their current kit isn't 'good enough'.
"so there's a lot to be said for a system that offers a couple dozen different UIs"
.. and this is why we fail.
Man alive, you're serious aren't you? Please God tell me there's nobody who relies on the decisions you make to keep them in a job.
The 'pie' you are talking about is minute. Tiny. Miniscule. HMV could have *all* of it and they would crash and burn like that Russian space probe.
"No, let's not sell products the majority of shoppers apparently want to buy, let's try selling those that the small minority want to buy, but will almost certainly order online because let's face it they're geeky anyway".
You can pull all the 'iPhad' stuff you like (way to get your idea taken seriously, by the way) but you don't get your way out of £160m of debt by catering to 'niches'.
Jon
"Assuming they can get that right - and it's trustworthy"
Bahahahahahhahaha...
Oh I'm really sorry, but that's a good one.
Just to clarify a point - the AppleTV is not and never has been a 'tv tuner'. If it's anything, it's a rather minimalist 'content relay device' between a Mac/'the cloud' and your TV.
Jon
Jesus. If it's anything liek BES's management interface I wouldn't touch it with a bargepole. RIM seem to think 35 tabs on a page is a good piece of UI design.
""We particularly urge Apple to take responsibility, as there are more than 300 workers working on the Apple keyboard assembly line," it added."
'But we apparently give much less of shit about the 700 who don't' it didn't add.
WTF as some of you people on? Seriously? You'd have to assume Jingmo had some hand in negotiating how many items were supplied at what price. Apple just don't drop out of the sky and say 'you will give us 10 million bodgers for three dollars each, or our wrath be upon you!' Presumably the management at Jingmo assured Apple they could supply that number of widgets and this price per unit over that period. You'd also have to assume they knew how many widgets their factory could produce per man hour of work, and what that would cost in wages.
So they either lied to Apple to get the contract and then found out they had to slave drive their workers to keep the promises they had made (which is bad enough) or they deliberately calculated the output they could manage assumingg they could force their staff to work completely unacceptable hours to fulfil the contract, which in any civilised place should be criminal.
As the oft quoted IT mantra goes 'Failure in your planning does not constitute a failure on my part'. Apple and Jingmo made a deal, and Jingmo said they could hold to that deal. They did so to terms, either knowingly or unknowingly, they could not fulfill without frankly awful working practices being imposed on their staff. All Apple have done in this is make a deal with a company to pay them to do something they said they could do.
If I was Apple, I'd be doing what I could to alleviate this, within the terms of the contract signed. But the idea that this is in any sense Apple's 'fault'? What?
I foresee nothing that could possibly go wrong with the endeavour.
(where's the 'batshit mental' icon?)
Opinion
David McLeman
Tim Worstall
Chris Mellor
Popular Stories
Features