Re: Video is rather unimpressive.
I wouldn't expect the video to be impressive. The budget on the other hand… WOW!
12190 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Apr 2007
Ahem, have you looked at the comparative budgets? And, of course, NASA is famous for having its budget cut and having its priorities set by the politicians.
Meanwhile, at DARPA, there's pretty much nothing you can't get funding for. The internet was strictly while it was just plain old ARPA, and things like the rest of the government still mattered. Now it's pretty much weapons, baby, yeah! But sharks with frickin' lasers are cool, right?
Have you got the magic combination that will allow me to install Outlook for a domain that isn't hosted by Azure? Microsoft "helpfully" removed the option to configure the server manually in Office 2019 and then backdated the change to older installers. As a result, even in a VPN, Windows will try and log you into Azure / Entra and if you don't have an account there, you're going nowhere: get the hint punk and move to W365.
I don't really mind because I only want the client to be able to experience user pain, but it is a further example of just how much they think they can get away with.
That's not necessarily possible for everyone. However, it is advisable for everyone to install Windows 11 with the network disabled so that no account with Microsoft, from which they assume they have all kinds of rights, is required. I personally found this guide extremely helpful. That, and Shutup Windows!, make the OS almost bearable again.
Because of the very many problems with the Mac app store (or should that be App Store) the better apps for MacOS largely went back to having their own distribution systems. A little more work for them but far less hassle when things go wrong with the store, which they frequently do.
I'm sure JAXA will only be too pleased to tell us all in due course. They really deserve more credit than they're getting for this but they're just not misanthropic or narcissitic enough! Yes, it tipped over but it got "within a gnat's crotchet" of the intended landing site.
I would have thought that if they can keep stuff dry enough, most components will be fine because they're solid. Maybe they already managed to squeeze a solid-state battery in?
We already have limits on the number of charge points that can be put on a street. Peak demand is what you have to plan for and that means lots of vehicles wanting to be charged at the same time. Meanwhile, generation is shifting away from baseload so "off-peak" is less relevant: California imports MWs as soon as the sun goes down.
You need to know who was buying and how much.
If numbers are above some expectations, an option to buy might be exercised. It could also be some gullible fanboys wanting to help their hero by buying some shares; even if they only buy one the valuation of the whole company will reflected in that transaction. Or someone who had been shorting the stock hit their numbers and got out.
Two different economists got Nobel Prizes for pointing out how erratic and asymmetric markets are, with information unevenly and unequally distributed; but that they eventually get things right.
I've seen people in the US change roads like that… down one verge and up the next… And a look at the statistics tells us that the US, despite being relatively sparsely populated, has more than its fair share of smash ups. In general I find driving in the US more relaxing that Europe with most drivers giving each other enough room. Except when traffic gets busy…
I think several accident blackspots led to the mixed design with lights introduced essentially to enforce speed restrictions. IIRC there is data around the number of vehicles using the junctions at peak times suggesting whether you can get away with no traffic management, a roundabout, one with lights, multiple systems of lights. I grew up watching major changes to the junction of Princess Parkway and Barlow Moor Road and the end of the Mancunian Way in Manchester. Accident rates increased with traffic volumes so changes were necessary. But I think the data also shows that mini roundabouts (the ones you can drive over) are worse than having nothing.
I think speed control is an essential corollary as is making sure the damn satnav understands the system. Everybody hates speed restrictions but in any situation where lane-changing is required, they demonstably improve throughput and reduce the risk of accidents: 5 mins at 30 km/h or 2 mins at 80 km/h followed by an hour at 5 km/h!
"Lower your speed and read the signs…" From casual observation I reckon this would exclude over 90% of all drivers!
I quite like the design but I think the design moves the lane-changing risk from the roundabout to the feeder lanes and I think problems changing lanes are common in many accidents. It's therefore essential to be able to have another a go if (when) you make a mistake.
Yes, credit should be given where it's due and Tesla pretty much created the EV market by showing that electic cars could look as "good" as normal cars and not the seemingly endless line of dorky concept cars that had been the market until then. And Musk should also be given credit for taking the risk on something other than a "platform" (Uber, et al.), and one that required real capital investment, rather than just paying for customers. But the rest, especially bypassing the banks to get money from the capital markets, is straight out of modern MBA manuals. We'll see how well that works when it comes to refunding their debts with interest rates no longer zero and stock prices at all time highs, thus suppressing the potential for gains in any putative stock for cash deals.
I don't understand the fools that thought Tesla was worth more than the 10 biggest automakers combined.
I'm not sure if anyone really did, just like they didn't believe AOL was really worth more than Time Warner. But that's not how capital markets really work. Tesla initially had an advantage by being first mover in a new market and with fairly impressive numbers. But the real reason for the high valuation was the financial engineering Musk employed to juice returns: the company never made much money on the cars but it did on the CO2 certificates they were eligible. With the higher valuation, Musk was then able to get better funding terms, which allowed him to do more deals such as Solar City. Huge balance sheet but very low debt and nearly positive cashflow, what's not to like when Treasuries have zero or negative yields? Small investors pile in buying small quantities of shares, driving the valuation even higher. I've lost count of how often we've seen Silicon Valley and the banks dupe retail investors like that. Suddenly, it seems everyone has a got a turkey.
Then inflation appears, as if by magic, along with competition and Musk offers Tesla shares as collateral in the Twitter deal. But, hey, everything he touches turns to gold, right? The competition appears and governments start winding down ruinous subsidies, and the valuation starts going backwards.
Even then, if I was getting into a price war, I wouldn't go with 4 or 5 % discounts. But, hey I'm not a dope-smoking sociopath! And shareholders will probably still award him the stock options.
"For the second quarter, the possibility of new color options combined with aggressive sales initiatives could bring the brand back into positive territory;"
So, Apple needs to go back to the not particularly effective (which was why it was dropped) colour strategy and reduce prices to succeed?
If it had only been handsets in the US then I think things might have been different. But the US then insisted in leaning on "allies" (the word used for countries who might agree with the US) to remove Huawei's networking kit, despite it being acknowledged as often by far the best kit (small, lower power requirements, etc.) for the job. Not only did this force the hand on chip development but also on things like software. Until then Chinese manufacturers were largely content to write skins and install bloatware, now Huawei has its own team for developing an OS…
I've never really understood why Huawei was singled out for sanctions. There are other far more effective ways to deal with the potential political and commercial risks but it was simply wrong to blame Huawei for being successful for anything other than its own track record on innovation. As it is, we've given homegrown Chinese silicon an unexpected boost and this, in turn, means that China will be able to supply chips to other countries that are sanctioned.
For consumers, I don't see much difference between Huawei and Xiaomi and any of the other Chinese manufacturers, or of any consumer electronics made or assembled in China.
The file format problem was solved a while ago and, to their credit, Microsoft have largely kept to their word and even publish the specifications for the extensions, though these are generally black box implementations, at least as far as the GUI goes. Macros are being increasingly phased out but support for them in other applications has been available for years. There only really VBA blobs so disassembling was never too onerous. Some people might like the "collaborative" aspects of working on the same document together but I suspect most people don't know about and there are other alternatives.
But people love Outlook and I haven't seen an open source client that does all the calendar and mailbox sharing people say they need. I'd love to be proved wrong. Maybe OX (formerly Open Exchange, handily developed in Germany is up to snuff).
When I look at all the tarrifs the US has introduced recently I wonder if they know what "level-playing field" means. However, it's safe to say that most non-Chinese sales of its domestic brand phones are to neither the US nor Europe: there are other people on the planet!
I think the most interesting thing is the collapse in Apple's sales which mirrors what has happened to other vendors over the last few years as we stop buying new phones every two or three years and even then often go for a cheaper option.
Can you give the model. Having recently fought yet again with MacOS to get my Samsung M2070 MFP to work via a Digitus print server, I'm preparing for the inevitable and looking for a compact replacement. I had been thinking of the HP 204 SDW but the brother would be an alternative. Print volume is minimal but I do have to scan stuff quite a lot.
This kind of contract is illegal in most countries outside the US. Even in the US there's case law against this kind of restrictive practice. However, as usual, it will take a big enough class action suit to make them change their practices. They should just hope they're caught colluding with other manufacturers to try and make the subscription-model, the only model.
You really do insist on repeating Trump's bullshit on unrelated issues. Victim of intimidation against standing for election? Not even close. Plenty of civil rights campaigners who've got the scars to prove that intimidation wasn't limited to legal threats.
I tried to keep the discussion to legal issues but you're just not interested: neither Musk nor Trump are the victim of judicial intimidation anywhere; in the case of Trump federal judges he's appointed have censured him. Both continue to use the courts when it suits them, but call foul when they themselves end up in court. Trump also continues to threaten legislators with primary challenges if they don't toe his line; whatever that might be today.
Sorry, but you're continuing tp take my remarks out of context.
In a country where judges stand for election, all court cases are potentially political, but the appeals process is supposed to even this out. Let it work its course.
Geriatric-in-chief could be applied to either candidate. Pity the country with such a poor selection of candidates. But only a little because it's had plenty of chances to reform the process.
EOM
In a criminal case, the evidence would have to be turned over. But, because US tort law is so generous, many cases are civil, NDAs and other gag orders apply and no one gets a subpoena. Lots of examples like this on Wall St cases precisely because out of court settlements cannot be treated as admissions of guilt.
Now if, for example, this was about a self-flying plane then the FAA would have demanded and got all the necessary data and I doubt that anything would be kept secret. They might also have demanded the grounding of all vehicles or at least disabling the software while investigations were carried out. The same would also be the case in many other countries where a criminal case would take precedence but also severely limit potential civil suits. But I'm not seeking to make any point other than that regulatory environments vary: the US traditionally prefers "light touch" after the fact regulation.
If the case did go to court and Tesla lost, Musk will still not be on the line, except if other shareholders decided to go after him. This is one of the reasons why the SEC came down on his unverifiable claims: he could be materially affecting shareholders.
But please keep your conspiracy theories to yourself. Facts: Trump was convicted of sexual assault and then of defamation. He has the right to appeal.
When it comes the fraud case, I'd refer you to the excellent analysis of financial crimes in Terry Pratchett's Going Postal: lots of victims even if you can't point to them. Again, he has the right to appeal.
You forgot to mention the incentives Tesla is offering to stop that market share dropping even faster.
BYD isn't exactly playing fair, but it's arguable that Tesla wasn't either as long as it could use its stellar market value to get preferential terms. When it comes to technology, the Chinese companies overtook most of the others a couple of years ago.
Whilst I think the original poster may be overinterpreting the judgement, you're not short of a little exaggeration yourself. Whatever Musk says, most of Tesla's employees are not engineers. Those that are unlikely to find it getting another employer and Musk might well be planning to "let them go" anyway. But, given how much protection US law provides for companies, that particular apocalypse is unlikely.
The settlement is to avoid any admission of liability and thus the possibility of class action suits, which regardless of their merits, could drag down the largest of companies.
Heh? Are you trying to turn this into a partisan issue? Musk would only personally be on the line in a case that demonstrated personal negligence by the board. That would almost certainly have to be something like fraud or embezzlement.
But, let's play the game: which particular victimless crime are you referring to? The one that saw Trump convicted of sexual assault? Definitely a victim there with compensation to show for it.
I think you may well be right but I also think that any move away could happen faster than they hope. Any decisions about VMWare will be taken in the data centre only and, as soon as someone comes up with a reasonable alternative for the stack and migration tools, then it's likely to get talked about, scheduled and done.
Right, I'm not pointing the finger and we can and should wait for the report and its findings. But I don't think it's possible to cover the story and not mention Boeing's recent safety record. Whether or not it's directly related doesn't matter: this is what as known as reputational risk and tends to keep hitting companies that think they can cut corners. IIRC the case study is how much Audi had to spend after a major recall incident.
It was under state ownership that worse decisions (price of the mini was set without know production costs) were made. Typical example of merging basket cases with reasonable businesses so that they all failed.
I'm not a fan of privatisation but we should remember how shit governments are at running companies that have to compete in markets.