Posts by Jeff
3 posts • joined Wednesday 18th June 2008 13:08 GMT
fushin
As per others comments ,it shouldnt even be near the internet ,as per tiering
and layered security ...security 101 ffs.
Strange how only Citec ( SCADA) has been mentioned over the last few years in SCADA kb's.
To expose major infrastructure with a web server ( as it does ) to external public subnets is actually breaching the laws in some countries and states. {<>}and any admin or manager who allows this should be fired .
These exploits will continue until we stop using the MS c+ development platform as mentioned in the other posts and utilise secure coding principles and platforms.
This scada package unfortunately only runs on the ms os ,and not nux ,apple etc.
perception and double deception
Another excuse under the new "act" to wage a cyber war against these
persistent little -communist boogers.
They have been hard at us for a while ,and still are , but the odd "friendly fire "
appearing to come from the enemy adds cred again to mass the troops
and DOS them ..
Lets watch our backs anyways ...70% of the traffic from CH is true anyways
so what does a little help from the inside do for a cause .?
I feel for the persons responsible for the admins of those laptops etc.
More Excuses ...lets help ....NOT
just another excuse to use others to develop a way to crack
PKI used in many areas .....lets all help them .......NOT
Opinion
David McLeman
Tim Worstall
Chris Mellor
Popular Stories
Features