Trend
Is the remains of MAPS - which used to be reasonably good (even if Dave Rand is a tosspot), but has gone to rack and ruin in the last few years. There's been quite a lot of discussion on academic mailing lists about them.
See also http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2011/08/a-disturbing-trend/comment-page-1/ - which is written and commented on by a lot of people who used to be MAPS biggest cheerleaders.
The explanation of how some IP addresses are ending up in the RBL was enough to convince $orkplace and others that MAPS usefulness has ended.
Not to worry, there are other other DNSBLs.
having said all that:
1: Lots of ISPs make a big fuss about their inbound spam filtering.
2: Very few apply any form of filtering to their OUTBOUND mail.
3: Anyone who uses their ISP email account for long-term purposes is a twit.
"Stopping spam" is a lot more about preventing it getting out (pollution prevention), than preventing it getting in - and that's best summed up by the question "Do you actually want to stop spam, or merely stop seeing it?"
I know ISPs and others regard abuse desks as a cost centre, but AOL found that by terminating abusive accounts they saved significant sums because most of those were on scammed cards (chargebacks are a killer), stolen identities, or had other issues which attracted significant costs (providing logs and other evidence for police is also costly).