The Channel logo

* Posts by Landis McGauhey

6 posts • joined Thursday 26th April 2007 10:55 GMT

Landis McGauhey

Too Late to Tunnel

I suppose it's far too late-- and thus would be far too expensive and far too disruptive to extant underground utilities-- to adopt the traditional-Russian "perekhodov": the underground pedestrian subways found, for example, at any major intersection in Moscow.

Also, there's the perekhodov's nasty habit of functioning as suicide-bomber magnets: the firmly-confined and crowded spaces multiply, probably exponentially-so, an explosive's efficiency and effectiveness.

Landis McGauhey

Peace *was* our Profession

As an alumnus of both the U.S. Army *and* the U.S. Air Force, I don't object to the comment of my brother from the 1st Infantry Division. Having said that, I will point out that neither this lapse nor the flying-across-the-country-with-nukes to Barksdale AFB lapse would have happened in the old Strategic Air Command.

Make mine the gloved lightning with the motto, "Peace is Our Profession".

Landis McGauhey

mirror image

Ever notice how extremists of all types most passionately love to hate those who mirror their own goals? This, for example: the same Westerners who love to demonize Islamists also (not-too-subtly) would love to have this same law, never mind how many constitutional safeguards it would trample.

Jealousy, I guess.

Landis McGauhey

re: "One billion PCs in use in 2008"

forecast: a billion/PCs by two-thousand-eight./from whence their power?

a billion PCs/in commission by next year/techs fry potatoes

predict a billion/PCs on earth by next year/whither the old Dells?

Landis McGauhey

anti-trust?

Will Microsoft actually produce or manufacture it? I thought the anti-trust legal eagles were willing to leave them alone as long as they didn't manufacture major hardware components.

Landis McGauhey

re: "How did we all end up with Windows?"

As much as my gut hates monopoly (and in particular loves to hate Micro$oft!), my brain knows there are no easy explanations or answers. Whilst monopoly generally is bad for consumers, standardization is good for many consumers, especially business. An optimum standard, however, isn't guaranteed by monopoly. For example, few open-minded consumers would deny, all other things being equal, the Mac is more functional than the PC. On the other hand, through standardization, few get stuck with eight-track, RCA video disc, or betamax. The issue then, is not standardization, but how to get there. Industry consensus (often by way of working group or committee) theoretically is preferable to monopoly, but also can be plodding (witness the current finger-drumming wait for the next-generation DVD standard). Industry consensus also can have at least as many anti-competitive concerens as monopoly and is no guarantee of the best alternative. The best we can hope for is Abraham Lincoln's "you can fool some of the people all of the time and all of the people some of the time but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time". Thus I look forward to a day when Mac, Solaris, Linux and operating systems as yet unknown equitably share the desktop with Windo$e.

Best regards.

Forums

Forgotten password

Opinion

euros_channel_money

Tim Worstall

Time to take a sniff at the coffee, perhaps
joe_tucci_emc_channel

Chris Mellor

Will they have to drag him back like last time?
chain_relationship_channel

Features

cloud_accounting
Playing the SLA long game
channel_teaser_money_top
cloud computing Fight
Applications must work for the cloud to float
Paul Cormier, Red Hat
How a Unix killer crawled from the dot-com bust