@Charles 9 Re: @Jonas
"Economics is, at its heart, the sciences involved in the distribution of a finite quantity: wealth (since wealth is based on matter, and matter is finite--ask any physicist--therefore wealth is finite, too). Economics NECESSARILY involves the transfer of wealth, and these transfers must necessarily be from one party to another..."
You're in luck, I'm a physicist who minored in resource economics. Your premise strikes me as false inasmuch as general economics isn't a zero sum game. Consider two markets, the stock market and the commodities market. The commodities market is a zero sum game where on person's gain are necessarily the loss of another, as there are only so many barrels of oil, pork bellies, etc. at a given time. Contrast this with the stock market which is not a zero sum game and aggregate wealth can be created and there needn't be any losers because it isn't based on "matter" but on another concept more commonly associated with "utility".
Certainly it may appear that the stock market is based on matter since every fule knows that the price of AAPL is based on how many bits of matter known as iP"odd" devices that Apple sells. That would be true if there wasn't any value, in the form of utility, added to the materials that constitute an iP"odd" in the same way that the commodities market works, pork belly in = pork belly out. It's that added value that doesn't come from "matter" that makes it different and yet it is the same inasmuch as it comes from energy in the form of labor, electricity and heat (that's blood, sweat and tears to you and me). How convenient it is then that you should bring up physics where we know that matter and energy are interchangable. Here we come to a rub since a fair deal of human energy comes from the sun via nutrition from vegetation, for you obligate carnivores that is regardless of whether rabbits eat it first (aside; preferably served with a nice sangiovese), and for practical purposes the sun's energy may as well be unlimited since when it goes dark the point rapidly becomes moot.
Should we find a way to shuffle off this terran coil what I'm uncertain of is that energy, and therefore matter, is limited and, lest this digress into a dissertation as to whether the universe is endothermic or exothermic and all hell breaks loose or hell freezes over, this should be left to another day.