Wörthersee?
I'm glad to see they're diversifying from sweets aimed at the grandfather market. Not sure why Audi wanted in on that act.
207 posts • joined Tuesday 16th June 2009 09:36 GMT
I'm glad to see they're diversifying from sweets aimed at the grandfather market. Not sure why Audi wanted in on that act.
You've got to admit that Ascension is a great name for a place to put the space elevator.
In fifty years time people would think that the place was named after the technology.
You're right. I emailed them to ask about this and got:
"As a newly launched company just coming out of stealth, we are not actively engaging business opportunities outside of the United States at the moment. Once we have expanded to a degree that allows us to deliver the quality, responsiveness and consistency that we know the international community expects, we will engage with partners and customers abroad."
OK, here's what I'm talking about:
Executive Summary
The act of travelling fast isn't of itself fatal.
Elaboration
As I pointed out, it's possible to travel in excess of 500mph in an aeroplane. This is the fastest possible current speed any average human can reach (ok, without joining a space agency). Many thousands of people do this every day without a single speed-induced death. Care to explain that for me? In case you'd forgotten, Concorde's passengers regularly (and safely) exceeded 1300mph for the best part of three decades. When Concorde did crash it wasn't speed that caused that accident either. If you were right then the fastest forms of travel would be the most dangerous, rather than the safest. With cars, motorways are the safest roads even though cars are travelling faster. Speed alone doesn't seem to be killing people there either.
I do accept that injuries are more likely to be serious if something goes wrong when travelling at a higher speed. The majority of such injuries are caused by abrupt deceleration and the effects of momentum on the body. I don't think that's in dispute here. Of course momentum has a relationship with speed but, sadly, that's not the message given out by the 'speed kills' lobby. It doesn't even seem to be your point.
You can only ever be right if you re-state your position as "inappropriate speed kills".
I do recall people saying, back when steam trains were a new idea, that to exceed a walking pace was likely to cause physical injuries and risk death. Is this what you have in mind? I'm pretty sure that to still be of that view (when it's been so comprehensively disproven) is where I'd be applying words like 'infantile' 'dumb' and 'fallacy'.
Just out of curiosity, what speed do you have in mind that will inherently kill someone?
"The reason those camera's are on the A40 / A23 are, as you said, because people think the speed limit is too slow and SPEED. Your own argument justifies the whole situation."
Not quite. A few years ago I might have agreed. But since councils started lowering the limits - and then put in cameras - it weakens this argument.
It used to be the case that speed limits were set based on the behaviour of a certain percentile of road users (i.e. the speed at which most sensible drivers had independently assessed as safe). Now it's all about risk avoidance: the limits come down and thus need more enforcement for the drivers who know it's safe to travel faster (and perhaps were allowed to go faster a few years previously on the same road). Parts of the A40 have been reduced to 40mph (down from 70).
I long for a return to the days when drivers' judgement was considered enough. The prosecutions happened to the drivers with the worst judgement.
There's nothing wrong with that statement. If speed did kill then travelling on an airliner would be the most dangerous thing anyone could do.
There's a lot of silly stuff said by Clarkson but on this issue at least he speaks sense:
"Speed has never killed anyone, suddenly becoming stationary... That's what gets you."
Oxford's bus/cycle lanes have a pedestrian-crossing-style push button at the head of the queue. This allows cyclists to gain the advantage of the bus lane's priority traffic lights even when no bus is coming.
Gravity is why a plummeting VW Beetle can beat a twin-turbo Porsche 911 over a mile.
Would you really want to have two 55" tellies side by side? I can see me wanting this tech so that my missus can watch her bloody awful singing/dancing/voting programmes while I turn to the Dave channel.
No need to ponce about with recordings and we can both watch something we like in the same room at the same time. Makes sense to me.
Read the name of this website, pal.
"why not go all the way and get with the times, go metric? "
BMW tried this with wheels for certain models, I seem to recall, in the 90s. I guess proponents of Teutonic efficiency dislike the mixture of inches (wheel diameter) and mm (tyre width).
If you're adamant about keeping the original wheels on one of those models every new tyre you buy costs very silly amounts of money.
Thinking an idea is better idea doesn't mean it'll pan out the way you want. For another example take a look at Brunel's 'broad gauge'.
If your parents happened to meet in the same city in which you had your first kiss, Apple - in their infinite wisdom - won't accept that as a possibility.
You could also cause confusion by using the Aussie word for flipflops.
"...often 15 or more years..."
I remember reading that the leading cause of death for Death Row inmates is actually old age.
"...over half the usage of iiNet’s internet service by its customers (measured by volume) was represented by Bit Torrent file sharing which was known to be used for infringing activities,”
The way I read it there's no proof that 'infringing activities' were taking place, just the fact that torrents were being shared. But that tone seems to be trying to infer 'so they must all be guilty'.
Thank heaven for a sensible judgement.
IIRC, Oracle was an acronym: Optical Reception of Announcements by Coded Line Electronics.
You were lucky. I had to make do with a ZX81 and a wobbly 16k RAM pack.
" If the seller has gone out of business in the second year onwards, then there's nothing you can do"
In the UK at least, buying it on a credit card makes the card company jointly liable for dodgy goods. Even if your supplier has gone out of business you're still able to get a refund from the card company. Here's a handy mnemonic for your (UK) rights:
Satisfactory Quality
As
Described
Fit for purpose
And last for a
Reasonable
Ttime.
And, yes, for quoting this, I am one.
Surely you'd claim work usage back through expenses? And if you're fired after two months it's no problem. Well, not for the employer, anyway.
You might find it's a bit more trouble getting your claims signed off though.
With a name like Colin, you wouldn't be an artificially cheerful robot by any chance?
Yes, I got one of those. I had bought a TV with a built-in OnDigital decoder but they didn't bother tailoring the letters for people without separate receivers. I wrote back saying something like 'see you in court, pal' and never heard another peep.
On the plus side though, the aerial they fitted for free is still doing sterling service.
"It's still backwards compatible with the full-size credit card style (unless there are networks that don't do that now)."
Somewhere in a cupboard I still have my old Motorola MR1 which takes a full credit-card-sized SIM. No need to unpick the SIM from the middle of the card. Ah, brings back happy memories of not even being able to compose those newfangled text messages.
We've been meaning to talk to you about that cat.
"There are plenty of other British scientific superstars, though, and it's about time they were properly honoured, like the French do."
I had no idea that the French had a tradition of honouring British scientific superstars. If that's the case I'll take back what I may have said about the French in the past.
If you're going to do something that could conceivably piss off another creature, always pick one that you can outrun.
...before we discover that CERN is basically collecting transmissions of alien porn downloads?
Last Friday one of the Raspberry Pi team came over from Cambridge and did a demo and lecture for us on the Pi.
It's amazing, when you've actually seen one in action, just how capable it is for the price. I also passed on the suggestion from these here messages that quite a few of us would happily pay the import-duty loaded premium for a British-built version.
When you need to support that kind of legacy software isn't that where HyperV could step in?
It's sounding mature enough to consider and of course, as a bonus, any vulnerabilities or issues with the 'buggy software written in the 1990s' are kept under control in a virtual machine rather than messing up the nice clean host server.
At the moment the iPlayer is limited to IP addresses that appear to originate in the UK (forcing people like me to use a VPN when travelling...)
There are plenty of people out there who would like to watch iPlayer content and, because they don't pay the licence fee and aren't in the UK, can't watch it. Why not let the Beeb earn a few quid selling programmes abroad via the iPlayer?
Also, since the iPlayer only offers content for a limited time, it's no bad thing to pay to see something you'd otherwise have to miss. After all you don't have to pay for it.
is this because you're worrying about the year 2100 problem?
Frankly (and as long as I can escape from gun-toting date nazis to survive long enough) if I'm still around long enough for two-digit years to be an issue again I'll be delighted.
"inferior shit like Xbox and iPads"?
If a product came to market that was demonstrably (and undeniably) better I don't think any amount of budget would stop it from being a success. This is especially true now that 'the power of the internet' allows people to share their personal preferences so widely.
"Apple and Microsoft have so much money they can buy whoever they want"
Are you trying to say that these two companies are immune from criticism because of their budgets? Is this your first visit here by any chance? I think it's fair to say that El Reg has a fair few folk who haven't been brainwashed yet...
"If they designed and engineered their products correctly, they wouldn't need to fight"
Apple inparticular have quite a reputation for their design quality even if you disapprove of every other aspect. It's also quite hard to think of any product that came to market in a form which was unimprovable.
I remember downloading the patch which restored the zombie's blood from green to red.
I think that may well have been one of my very first downloads.
(well, at least from the ones I can admit to, anyway)
I kind of see your point. But the problem is that we haven't yet stopped thinking in imperial for quite a few types of measurement.
For example: can you honestly say you already know your own height in metric units?
I can still remember the first time I played Pong. Life was a lot simpler in those days, people were nicer, the sun shone brighter and it was all fields around here too.
This technology is fitted to all Citroen C4 Grand Picassos, as long as they have the xenon headlamps option.
The most bizarre version of this is on the VW Tourag which lights up the appropriate foglight to illuminate the apex of a curve. If you only glimpse this in action briefly it makes it appear that the other side's bulb has burned out.
French guys usually seem happy to carry on chatting mid-pee from those bizarre hides-a-bit-of-you metal shed pissoir things with no sense of shame at all.
I'm guessing that to actually suffer embarrassment the picture must have been very close up indeed.
I always thought Sellotape was the 'sticky-backed plastic' they referred to. Was that something else?
Isn't this why the higher-end 64bit versions include the capability of running a 32bit copy of XP as a virtual machine?
For devices which are only used occasionally it's adequate for the job. It's far from a perfect solution but it does offer a limited lifeline for otherwise unsupportably-old apps and devices.
I believe that Apple's architecture change caused similar issues...
Would you have preferred it if the article stopped mid-sentence?
...and they created a sound on the Mac called 'sosumi' as a way of showing their high regard for legal process.
Tony Blair was 'before the wars'?
Exactly which wars do you have in mind here?
About six months ago I binned my BlackBerry in favour of Android. And I've found that the permissions handling on Android seems to be all about the app's author and not the device's owner.
An example: I used to use a newspaper app on my BlackBerry but not permit the connections it wanted to make in order to display in-line advertisements. I liked that capability but I'm pretty sure the authors didn't.
My first view was to be as dismissive as my fellow commenterstards have been. But I think I see your point. Sure, right now an iPad isn't the best way to write a big document but just being able to do so represents a massive change in direction for MS.
I think it's probably more that people realise that in a sub-£100 category design isn't going to sway people's opinion as much as saving a few bob.
Even more ironic? The car tax folk at the DVLA would still have it listed as a zero emission (and thus tax free) vehicle...
Can I play too?
Because the other week I had to use a supermarket's self-scanner chip-and-pin unit with one duff key. It was supplying two keypresses for each press (i.e. the PIN was being mis-entered even when the correct keys were pressed).
It took two goes for me to realise that it was the device at fault rather than my typo. I gather that dozens of people locked out their PINs before the store thought to close that particular terminal.
I only discovered Scroogle in the past week or so, from an article discussing Google's new policy and how to hide from their ever-widening reach.
My guess is that others have done the same which has tipped the balance a little too far for Google to ignore. The funny thing is that I cheerfully abandoned AltaVista, Webcrawler, Hotbot, Yahoo and the rest in favour of Google because I liked their honest and fair approach.
What I struggle to understand is why they'd piss away their hard-earned reputation quite so easily. Sure, I can see that Scroogle would be a nuisance but, seriously, does it really hit their profits for a few privacy-conscious folks to hide? When your corporate motto is seen as a joke (at best) and a lie (by others assessing your actions) you're in danger of burning bridges.
Such a shame.