Re: Charitable lot
Jeez. Do some basic research.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/15-biggest-companies-don-t-184200134.html?guccounter=1
3879 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Jun 2009
Really?
Show your working that its impractical.
(A simple google will show you baseload is a concept with no objective reality.)
The *worst* renewable generation day last year in Feb produced 33% of demand. Ergo 3-5 times the current capacity (most of which has been added in the last 10 years) is achievable between now and 2050.
Hinkley C - our only new Nuke plant actually under construction was started in 2018 and is now not scheduled to be operational until 2027. It will add 3.2GW of capacity.
None of the other UK "new nuke" plants have even broken ground.
In *1 year* between 2021 and 2022 the UK added 4GW of renewables. So in the same timeline you could add 40+GW if you put your mind to it.
Before anyone says baseload. its a myth. No-one has even even put a number on what Baseload needs to be, and it can be addressed by renewables just like mass cheap storage does - by extensive overprovisioning.
Reading between the lines this is rollout and deployment. They wont be in a position to give Palantir actual requirements, and even if they did the septics would ignore them. NHSEngland are probably quite capabile of fucking up the requirements on their own.
Errrm. KPGM are actually Anglo-Dutch and because they are mostly a set of limited liability partnership the segregation between country entities is a lot higher than most multinationals. Their US staff is the biggest in term of headcount tho....
This will be KPGM UK getting £10m of PR glitter to sprinkle over the £300m Palantir Turd.
TBF hes not wrong on Streeting.
No mainstream politician has the answer to funding the NHS because the costs are increasing year on year in line with an aging population, and the cold hard reality is that funding has to come from higher taxes.
Until Labour (maybe) or the Tories (no chance) break ranks and start talking about using taxes for adequate funding for a decent service the NHS is f*cked.
Funnily enough I've been thinking of Vinge and Brin a lot lately.
Have just belated got around to reading Adrian Tchaikovsky's Children of Time novels - just finished the first and started on the second.
The first is basically inspired by Deepness in the Sky and Uplift War - but done really well and a homage to both parents.
Worth digging out. Took me ages because I have this irrational aversion to books being recommended because they are award winners. (Arthur C Clarke's in this case).
Is that a Helicopter warning sign or a Spider warning sign?
BOFH Cattle prod of doom for you.
IT Estate is not a plane.
ITIL (or any other framework worth its name) has an Incident Management process that includes a role for Incident Comms, that should cover all your user stakeholders including the general public .... and for which the press is a valid comms channel.
Your ERP goes down and you're not giving the CFO hourly updates on the expected recovery time and process - your IT dept is a clown car.
Its been 20 years since I've done IM. This is basic stuff.
I think you're a little too negative on this one - at least as far as UK law goes.
The announcement (if reported accurately) is a blanket policy and open to huge challenges, and potential joint actions by multiple 10's of employee's.
There is zero chance Dell will try to blanket enforce this in the UK.
Expect them to quietly back out and say it was US only.
But don't be surprised to hear of huge payouts by Compromise agreements to keep everything on the down-low.
It doesn't spy on anything you are doing. Yes it has some access by default but its not (currently at least) doing stuff with that access unless you explicitly tell it to.
If you're worried about that you need to spend a lot more time working about MS Graph. Thats the monitoring-ware.
Case in point - look at the default Edge Home page OR if you want real nightmares look at MS Delve. It basically can tell you what your boss had for breakfast.
The post office is not unique in using Private Prosecutions and has no special powers to do so, (in spite of its origin as being one of the earliest Investigations function.
The difference for the PO was that the Legal system was *accustomed* to them doing so *at scale*, some of the usual scepticism that maybe another private company would get was missing.
Eh? Are you drunk?
Considering he was sideswiped too he's not put a foot wrong. His decision at every point has been to protect MS's investment in Altman and his inner circle who are the geese laying the golden eggs.
The El Reg article on this from yesterday has aged rather badly. Lol.
Your first comment was a bust - but keep digging.
Not a Musk fan but SpaceX payloads have some of the lowest insurance costs around because it's the most reliable launch platform in existence.
Its exactly how deep SpaceX's pockets are. SpaceX expect and have planned for the first few launches to be underwritten by themselves, and will be offering hugely discounted payload fees.
Why do you think he launched the Roadster on Falcon Heavy?
Duh.
You are confusing your geeky needs with general use cases - they are not the same thing.
You *want* 16Gb coz you are willy waving. Coz bigger in better innit. Do you own an SUV?
I agree with the general tone of the article but the reality is there are tons of use cases where 8Gb is plenty.
Even on Windows - ironically have at 2012 MBA with 4Gb comfortably running basic browser and office tasks using Win10 Bootcamp.
Unless you're a tier one enterprise who can piss money and pride up the wall developing your own LLM's the only game in town are those LLM's from the hyperscalers, for which re-training and fine tuning are very limited options anyway. With a bit of prompt engineering they are pretty good - certainly for the general stuff you're likely to throw at them via Snowflake.
The actually cost of running the hyperscalars LLM's are buttons too - only the artificial price points set by the hyperscalars is a consideration. Anything from with GPT3.5Turbo is peanuts, GPT4 is still expensive but expect that to come down as the competition builds....
(Theres some interesting low resource LLM's emerging on places like Hugging Face, but Consumer grade LLM's from the hyperscalers is mostly where its going to be at unless you've got a big Data Science team struggling to stay relevant.).
This case has always struck me as a bit strange.
As others have pointed out showing that apple actually profited from this action is counterintuitive as they lost out on upgrades and similar. No-one has shown or proven any nefariousness on Apples part merely what appears to have been a poorly communicated effort to improve battery life and stability.
I dont see how ANY sane judge could rule that people have suffered a financial loss from Apples activities, and therefore are due damages. Even if they have suffered a loss there is no way to show its been anything but trivial.
This stinks of a monetisation play by greedy lawyers rather than any pro-active consumer led action.
Your last line is BS.
In 2018 the cheapest MPB 13" with touchbar was $1800 a year before that the *real* budget 128Gb non-touch model was $1300.
Today - the cheapest MPB 14" M3 is $1700
13" 2013 MBA base price - $1099
13.6" M2 MBA base price $1199.
So Apple prices have been pretty stable, they've always commanded a premium but there is little evidence to show that that the premium has increased with the M series processors.
Apart from the fact that you never, ever, ever customise these monolith POS ERP systems, there is no way Oracle doesn't have a way to allocate cash across accounts. I know of 3 from our Oracle implementation and I have kept as far away as humanly possible from it, someone with product knowledge would know more.
Its shit, but its not that shit.
Whats the betting the big 3 (EY, PWC, KPMG) have done the majority of the cash hoovering that took it to £100m?