Morally how is this different to phone hacking? Interceptions carried out in the name of profit, with little corporate governance and respect for lawful privacy...
Should Google not be getting the "Murdoch Treatment"?
15 posts • joined Monday 28th September 2009 07:42 GMT
Morally how is this different to phone hacking? Interceptions carried out in the name of profit, with little corporate governance and respect for lawful privacy...
Should Google not be getting the "Murdoch Treatment"?
When someone namedrops someone higher up and says "He has said this needs to be pushed through, can you just f***ing Do It!".
JFDI - it ALWAYS goes wrong...
Phorm for Mobiles?
DPI of mobile network traffic with accompanying location information. I'd switch provider first.
They have facial recognition in Xbox Live, so it may be a move to have that style of technology built into Windows 8 security model. Kinect means it wont be fooled by a cardboard cutout, but a rubber mask or prosthetic makeup may dupe it.
Users don't understand storage costs when wrapped in a service, because world+dog knows 1TB costs £60 from PC world. Not thinking about the additional costs that make up the service, like high availability, DR, the backup hardware costs, manpower costs and paying Iron Mountain to look after your tapes.
Does this not give BT ammunition for authorising DPI for its subscribers to ensure they are not copyright infringing?
Seems a lot of weak (short?) planks in the defence...
Did it rollover for a greater purpose?
As I understand it Insurance uses a LOT of profiling data, and employs a huge degree of statistical maths to generate it's risk profiles.
Those profiles happen to include one for gender, but they also include age, post code, whether you have on street parking and every other question you have to fill in when getting a quote.
You are then given a risk profile which dictates your premium. If we are saying mathematical discriminiation is bad, unfair and there illegal, are we not undermining scientific principles?
So Age risk profiling will be next to be outlawed, and everyones premiums will go up to match the current risk profile of a 17yr old "Boy Racer" as that is the safest financial risk the insurer can offset.
Whilst you can generally manipulate statistics to show the view you want to present, a simple bar chart of value of payouts vs gender is simple, and effective.
Either they do, or they don't present a bigger, or smaller, risk profile, and should be compensated, or not, accordingly.
So should Clarks trademark Shoe Shop?
"This information has been in the public domain for a year. Plenty of time for the banks to act on it, plenty of time to block the process."
Have you seen the Change Process hoops you have to jump through to get a change approved in a financial institution!
I'm amazed Barclays managed it!
My view is that they are trying to use as much of the same base code for the next iteration of Small Business Server, and Home Server as they can to save dev money. As some have alluded to WHS has had some gains in the small business areas because of its automatic backups, sharing of data, and the ease of use. All of which appeal to "micro" businesses that have hosted email with their own domain, or more likely their ISP hosted mail.
My guess is that they couldn't get Drive Extended to work with Exchange and SQL Server, which are core services in SBS, due to the way drive extended replicates and balances the data around the drive pool. That probably breaks databases.
I seem to recall an earlier issue with the Drive Extender fixed in Power Pack 1 regarding Access databases.
I use WHS, I think it rocks. But I get mine through Action Pack subscription, I do think it's overpriced though.
Stu
Why not go the whole hog and do a Virgin and be an MVNO on someone elses backbone. Billing all done through ITunes...
Allowing you to internationally roam without the need for additional hardware, sim etc.
Will Chrome OS have the same ballot screen?
Presuming that Opera, Firefox et al do a compile for Chrome? Would Google be compelled to offer the same browser choice on their OS?
At what point of OS Market Share does it become compulsion to offer choices over the default browser for the OS Vendor?
Given corporate dependence on IE is this really necessary for Enterprise & Professional versions of Windows, because a single user is not going to make the corporate decision on what the COE browser is going to be.
So the ballot screen os only going to have limited impact on browser market share, and key protagonists won't get the result they seek.
Was listening to the news last night, and Step-Parents are only covered when care of the children is in the home.
Outside the home they are not exempt, and would potentially need vetting it they take longer than 2 hours shopping, zoo visits and other such days out that last longer than 2 hours on more than 14 occasions per year except between the hours of 6pm-2am.
My head hurts this is so stupid.
"The computers WILL give off heat, it has to go somewhere."
Isn't that the problem of the Cloud Architecture though, using more than one computer to do the job of one computer?
I work for an enterprise client that is heavily into Citrix to deliver thin Applications that are run on full fat desktop machines, these are then left on 24/7 because of bad GPO settings for power management, and the apparent need to schedule client patching out of hours.
If you are going into a Cloud Architecture, you need low powered clients, such as Revo/Lenovo Q Series, otherwise you are not moving the "heat" that a service generates around, you upto doubling it when one user alone is on a Citrix App server.
I've yet to see a convincing arguement for web based applications, which is what these datacentres are being pumped up for, that and serving adverts.
This is just as bad as Patio heaters are for Global Warming. Cold air in, hot air out, directly contributing to raising of ambient local temperatures.
To call this sort of data centre green, or environmentally friendly is wrong.