No-one sensible has listened to Woz...

For about 20 years now, surely?

IMO

Of course everyone should be tutored in the basics of coding - in the full knowledge that 99% won't pursue it or care. At the very least, it will give them a little bit of insight into and respect for people who are skilled programmers. A proper, broad-based education should provide students with introductions into a wide variety of stimulating learning experiences, logic, information theory and programming are certainly among them.

Several Things...

1. Rasterised typography? WTF?

2. It's not an iPad 3. It's an update. Everyone but you seems to know this.

3. Improved graphics ARE an improvement. However, no-one is forcing you to upgrade your Apple product every time Apple issues an updated or redesigned model. If you genuinely believe you are required to do this then you need counselling.

Apple has updated last year's iPad 2 with a new screen type which offers higher resolution. That's an improvement. They've also improved the performance of their SoCs GPU. That's an improvement.

Only the mentally ill could find these facts a cause for writing an article like yours.

Was that really

the whole article?

Wow

what a bunch of miserable wankers we have posting comments today. It costs as much as a fucking Snickers bar, what's not to like?

We all love Woz but...

...what he knows about phones can just about be crammed onto the back of an envelope.

Utter Horseshit

Kodak was and continues to be at the absolute forefront of digital imaging technology. If Kodak made a mistake with DI, it was by investing TOO MUCH in digital R&D rather than in product. Inkjet printing it exactly the kind of business Kodak should be in - it was their dye-sub printers that made digital printing a reality in the first place.

Honestly, Bayer pattern CFA, Cineon, dye-sub printer, DPX, Spirit the list of Kodak innovations goes on and on and on.

An idiotic srticle written by someone who knows nothing about DI.

I've had enough of this. EVERY review I read of a limited range EV centres on the same boneheaded idea "let' see if we can use this range limited car to travel long distances". No-one, literally NO-ONE will buy a 100mile range car if they need to travel more than 100 miles. I don't know if you're treating your audience as if they were stupid or are simply too stupid yourselves to understand the fundamentals of EVs. In addition to this, you didn't even have the home charger installed - even though THAT"S THE WHOLE EFFING POINT OF AN EV. I give up, I really do.

Brilliant Game

runs PERFECTLY under emulation on the iPhone.

If the sky above ALMA is devoid of water vapour...

...why are there clouds in the sky in your pics?

Fix required.

"Without external access, users of these online services must go through Apple's own software, which is tied to its own hardware – the iPhone and iPad."

The sense of this is incorrect, it should be written thus:

"Without external access, users of these online services must go through Apple's own software, to which is tied its own hardware – the iPhone and iPad."

iTunes and the iTMS were never tied to the iPod, rather it's the other way round. Anyone using MacOS or Windows can use iTunes and the iTMS.

Horseshit.

There'll be a new iPhone model in 12 months time, ready for any LTE networks that still won't have been built.

FireWire OR USB?

...embarrassingly bad. Not fit to plug into an Apple PC.

RIP

THE Steve