@ Brian
Shouldn't Harry Potter be in nappies by now then??
14 posts • joined Thursday 17th May 2007 11:09 GMT
There was an article the other day that said phone emissions may harm your testicles. Nothing was said about chemical burns and shrapnel!!
I oersonally found 'Oh, splendid's sarcasm to be perfect, just subtle enough yet dripping with venom.
Florida treated for cancer
is cheaper than a separate UPS!
Wow, so much anger at the possibility of an 'original story' would you all prefer MORE endless remakes???
I admit though, getting an 'original story' out of Hollywood these days will be an event in itself.
Shouldn't Harry Potter be in nappies by now then??
How come everyone seems to forget the other Linux based mobile OS that is in development? It doesn't have big backing but for my money looks like it will produce a more open phone if it can beat the other 2 to a full scale release (and survive a buyout).
OpenMoko.org
If you want to know if "making available" is a crime, ask the RIAA and pals.
In Cyprus they don't tax booze and strangely, not everyone is dropping dead before they hit 30.
This is a cultural issue, increasing the price of the problem will only cause financial hardship for those who find life in the UK so unbearable.
Half of these items (pistol, golfclub, fishing rod) already exist as 3rd party products. I hardly think that puts Nintendo "always one step ahead of third-party peripheral designers". Its possible that Nintendo might find that they are violating someone else's patent?
"It's going to be her 81st birthday present."
Is that a present for her 81st birthday or is she just getting a lot of gifts this year??
Funny thing is I am pretty sure the OS on this thing is Linux but try as I might, I cannot find a link to the source code on WD site at all.
Ha Ha! v funny.
Try reading it again and you will see that the cause is a HARDWARE issue. You can't upgrade the software if the hardware isn't supported, this applies to M$ as well!
It's not the cautious actions of the police when they thought there was a gunman in the house that is being ridiculed here. Its the stupidity of their actions once they realised that the 'gunman' was just a mannequin.
Mind you, it doesn't say anywhere that the guy didn't actually have a gun in his house...