Re: Bezos lost
I'm not including the 'starship' concept under development as that has'nt got to orbit yet
Why not? It's part of SpaceX's bid and shows they have the start of working hardware and not just pipedreams.
3274 publicly visible posts • joined 30 Jan 2010
The Register has recently received approaches from upstart pure-play software-defined networking vendors suggesting we write that their approach will deliver new networks, faster, than will be possible if buyers wait for Cisco's supply chain to deliver
And what do these pure software networking systems run on? Silicon Chips. And what's the problem affecting IT at the moment that's the cause of Cisco supply chain issues? Supply of silicon chips.
The headline could be construed as click-bait - but this is El Reg we're talking about here and the writers have a sense of humor.
The sub-head gives more clarity to the topic and the article explains the point. The El Reg angle on this article isn't nanny-state interfering but humor around beer flavors. (Which many of the commentards have followed up with)
And you know what: If you think the headline is click-baity, don't click on it or waste time posting a comment.
Scott Manley has done an excellent video on the plausability of a duct-tape space suit.
I use both InteliJ & PyCharm on a 7-year old laptop.
I accept that at launch my laptop's fan kicks in as the IDE re-indexes the code & libraries (More for InteliJ than PyCharm). But that only lasts a second or two and after that, the fan is silent and the IDEs are as fast as I need. e.g. auto-complete suggestions pop up instantly and are intelligent in their suggestions, finds are pretty much instant, etc.
I used to use Eclipse (on the same laptop) and that was glacial in comparison to the JetBrains products.
If it wasn't for the release notes saying "Updated JVM to version <BLAH>" I wouldn't have guessed the products were written in Java.
I was involved in a project where we discovered that a slip of the pen had resulted in the wrong type of cable specified. The lawyers told us it was cheaper to let the contractors install the cable, then pay someone to pull it out, throw it away and install the correct one, than it was to vary the contract specification by one word. (The material cost difference between the cables was close to zero)
From my understandng the original NASA contract said they wanted the bidder to commit some of their own money to the cost of designing & building the vehicles.
SpaceX replied saying "See those rockets we're building and flying over in Texas....?"
Bezos' bid, being run by traditional companies, rubbed their hands in glee at the thought of another lucrative cost-plus government contract.
makes Azure the cheapest place to run Windows Server and SQL Server in the cloud
We have a small SQL Server app and were looking to move it to Azure. Until we saw the cost. Either we've misunderstood Azure's pricing calculator or anyone who runs SQL Server in Azure has more money then sense. I think the standard on-prem license broke even in under a year compared to Azure. I thought the cloud was supposed to be cheaper?!?
If only we knew how to get it out clinicians might not need AI / startups and lots of money
There's your problem. From a Bean Counter's view, Clinicians are terrible. They have to be paid to work, have to have paid time off, sometimes get ill themselves, cost a fortune to train, occasionally get things wrong and in parts of the world with employee rights are difficult to get rid of. AI is a simple fee, which is predicable, easy to fire (i.e. turn off) if you don't like it and people blindly believe because "It's computers"