Re: Why are you going with Psion comparisons?
I've used both a Nokia Communicator (Several flavors) and Psion devices (several flavors) It's definitely more like a Psion than a Communicator.
3274 publicly visible posts • joined 30 Jan 2010
We're not the size of Cloudflare, but we use software which tracks every server, switch, patch panel, PDU, cable (data & mains), duct, etc. in our machines rooms. Any scheduled work has to be pre-booked through the software (Which gives you a report on what you're going to do) Any emergency work has to be updated into the software ASAP.
Failure to comply with using the software is quite simple: Everyone gets to take the piss out of you for causing someone else pain. (Yes, I've been on the receiving end) No management intervention required as peer-pressure is a far more effective stick in this situation.
The initial inputing of the data was a tedious piece of work and getting buy-in took some time, but now everyone sees its value. Now, when someone says "What happens if I cut this cable?" you click a button and it immediately tells you what will be affected.
Since we rolled out Teams across our organisation we've inundated with requests for Zoom so people can see everyone in a meeting.
We spoke to our Microsoft account team and it was hinted that Microsoft just don't have the compute power to handle more video streams on screen at once at the minute.
a typical dual CPU with a decent amount of memory will support 100,000 users
Doing what? Chat? Yeah, that's probably do-able.
What about some of the other toys MS-Teams has: File sharing/syncing, voice calls, video calls, conferencing, etc.
You're not going to get 100,000 video (Or voice) users on that dual CPU box.
I'm not usually one to stick up for MS (I've sworn at them many times over the years) But the commentards here who are saying "Why don't Microsoft just expand capacity - it's just cloud". Why not consider these minor details called "facts":
Firstly, the number of users of Teams has dobuled in less than three months, from 20 million to 44 million users.
Secondly, the amount of use people are making of Teams is going to be much, much higher. I don't have a figure for this, but let's guess and say it's doubled.
So the number of users have doubled and the usage has, in effect, quadrupled. Running a service at this scale isn't going to be just a couple of virtual machines. So quadrupling the capacity in such a short space of time isn't going to be a trivial exercise. You're also going to be needing more hardware and more bandwidth - the cloud has to run "somewhere".
Yes, we will give all of you free access. What we will not tell you is the actual cost
Nor will we give you the tools to extract your data.
Files are easy: Just copy them out (Subject to rate limiting...)
Onenote: "Export as PDF" is MS's answer.
Chats & Posts? Nope. Kiss goodbye to them.
Not just Teams, Onenote & Outlook eat battery on Macs too. I found these apps have the ability to eat the battery of my MBook Pro is under an hour when they're misbehaving. My suspicion is that they don't like it when you move between network connections (e.g Wired & Wirelss)
Er, only in its basic form. If you want to use vCenter, you have to pony up. From https://www.vmware.com/uk/products/vsphere-hypervisor.html
Moving up to a paid vSphere lets you further optimize your IT infrastructure. You'll be able to:
Pool computing and storage resources across multiple physical hosts.
Have centralized management of multiple hosts through VMware vCenter Server.
Deliver improved service levels and operational efficiency.
Perform live migration of virtual machines.
Take advantage of automatic load balancing, business continuity, and advanced backup and restore capabilities for your virtual machines.
Just read part of that judgement. Quite an easy read. I especially love para 929:
This approach by the Post Office has amounted, in reality, to bare assertions and denials that ignore what has actually occurred, at least so far as the witnesses called before me in the Horizon Issues trial are concerned. It amounts to the 21st century equivalent of maintaining that the earth is flat.
So the Post Office basically stuck their fingers in their ears and went "La La La, can't hear you" to any suggestions that their system was broken.
A friend took over the running of a small shop. Their till software & credit card machines all rely on the cloud. I did say that they need to think of what happens when (not if!) their net connection goes down. I did try to explain that the cost of a 2nd net connection would be dwarfed by the loss of income if things went down.
Then things went down.
And they paniced.
And still won't invest in a second 'net conection.