police said that, following nearly a month of investigation
It took them a month to reach that conclusion? WTF were they doing in that time?
3275 publicly visible posts • joined 30 Jan 2010
Ask librarians & archivists about this. It's something they worry about all the time. Just look at the BBC Domesday project. After just a short period of time they were unable to read the discs.
Where I work, there's a team who keep one of every type of tape drive they've ever come across. People sometimes laugh at their collection. The people who come along with some ancient tape archive only ever leave with a smile on their face. (And their beer fund severely reduced)
I was going to mention that too. One of the points I remembered about that program, was one of the pilots saying that after they did some market research they found that customers didn't actually know how much their ticket cost and so they could increase it and improve their finances.
Data protection legislation is genuinely a Good ThingTM. But many people use data protection as an excuse for not doing something. Most of the time, when someone says "I can't do that because of data protection" they're usually lying as they haven't the faintest clue about data protection and are just using it as an excuse to hide their laziness or incompetence.
In general, you are absolutely correct. However, in my defence, when this problem first started, people in the logistics industry pointed out that DHL had never done food (At anywhere like this scale) before and they'd bid seriously low in order to win the business.
We got a new account manager at a reseller. I asked for a quote for some software licenses. The price seemed far too cheap. I went back three times and asked them to check the price. Every time they came back and said the price was correct. In the end, I sent off a PO to them for the quoted price. Thirty minutes later I got a phone call. The account manager had got the price hideously wrong and was told that if I insisted they put the order through, the company would supply at the agreed price but the account manager would get fired on the spot.
I did the honorable thing and asked them to ignore the order and issue me with a fresh quote.
I don't use them enough so always look them up.
Don't be embarrassed. You have to be regularly dealing in subnet masks to easily switch between /28 and 255.255.255.240 I've seen many network engineers with little crib sheets on the side of their monitors to cross reference between the two formats.
Hurrah for everyone who found it "simple" to migrate to IPv6. Now kindly share your tutorials rather than sniffing at us old dinosaurs.
To add IPv6 to my Cisco router was a line in the VLAN interface to add the IPv6 Address, plus a few lines to my BGP config to distribute my IPv6 subnets.
On my Ubuntu boxes, it was a small text file (About two or three lines) to add an IPv6 Address.
Windows was a trivial point and click.
The Apache website just required an additional Listen directive.
My web apps (which are fronted by Apache) needed no changes.
About time the fines were more than a operating expense.
I heard a story about a public body that signed a contract with a company for the supply of a system. The contract had numerous penalty clauses for delays and inability to meet performance requirements. After several delays and no real sign of the system being able to work, the public sector client looked to invoke the penalty clauses. The supplier said the client was free to invoke them, but if they did, the supplier would be filling for bankruptcy as it could't afford to pay any.
The public body was stuck between a rock and a hard place.
Calls, texts, letters, and e-mail all cost money, but Facebook is Free.
- Most mobile & landline contracts now have bundled local calls. And for non-local calls, people are using Skype, Facetime, etc.
- Most mobile tariffs have "unlimited*" texts
- Email via GMaill, etc. is free. The only cost is the data that you already use to connect to Facebook.
- I'll give you that letters cost. But how many people actually send hand written letters any more when more instant communication is now available?
*We're all friends here, so we know what this really means.
Looking for one vender only, DOES spur competition. The best deal wins
But only for the initial purchase. Once signed, the vendor is more than able to screw the customer with either price increases, huge lags in price decreases or just s**t service.
As for a ten year contract: That's crazy. I'm reluctant to sign five year contracts, let alone a ten year contract. That's a guarantee of getting shafted by the supplier (Unless, of course, brown paper bags, etc...)
We really need to start investing in generic deep space comms to get data from these remote probes back to Earth in a more organized manner.
I know sending a Tesla rover to a distant planet is far sexy and easier to sell, but it's these kinds of infrastructure items that people like governments need to push through.
What if the cattle herd wandered to one end of the fuselage? Might throw off the balance.
That reminds me of a very nerdy joke one our University lecturers used to like to tell in his Control Systems lectures. The punch line was "The plane crashed because all the poles were in the right hand side of the plane"
A virtual pint for anyone who understands that!
I've been very fortunate and I've been upgraded to Economy Plus, Business & First Class. (Not being a frequent flyer, lady luck has most definitely been looking down on me)
Being a six foot chunky monkey, I appreciated the extra room in all the upgrades but all the "posh" stuff in Business & First Class was wasted on me.
An awful lot of "sports" are basically just that..
I've seen a couple of interviews with pro cyclists. They all say that professional cycling is all about pain endurance: Who can handle the pain the longest? I'd be surprised if many other endurance sports don't have similar characteristics.
How delightfully non-PC
If the competition was strictly man carries his own wife, then you may have a point. But the article clearly said:
"Males or females carry a "wife" (who must be at least 18 and can be male or female, and does not actually need to be the carrier's wife)"
So it could be woman carry man, man carry man, etc. Nor do they have to be married, civil partnership or even in a relationship.
Your security people shouldn't just be dictating what users should or should not be doing. They should be engaging with the users and finding out what the users need to do. Then the security people should come up with appropriate security controls and test them with the users.
If you fail to engage with the users, they'll see you as a blockage and try to work around you. Usually resulting in a horrible mess of personal cloud accounts (gmail, dropbox, etc) that central corporate have no knowledge of.
HAL's core programming was for the accurate and transparent processing of data.
In 2010, we discover that the NSA hid the existence of the Monolith from Bowman & Pool. The scientists were told about the Monolith before being put into hibernation, and HAL was told about it in case the human crew perished so he could carry on on his own. But HAL was instructed not to mention the Monolith to Bowman/Pool.
It was this contradiction of being transparent yet being told to hide something that sent HAL mad.
I seem to recall that as Bowman removes parts of HALs CPU/Memory, he finally reveals the hidden orders about the Monolith.
The telescope is being put together by Northrup Grumman
Is this the same Northrup Grumman that put a national security payload on a SpaceX rocket and failed to detach it properly, thereby wasting a few billion dollars in just a few minutes?
Are they the Crapita of the American space industry?
I get the impressions that today's school children are taught how to pass exams.
Schools are under huge pressure to get good exam results. That's all they care about. Helping children in the real world isn't important.
It's just like the NHS: As soon as league tables were introduced, administrators/managers looked to see what they could do to get the best results for the least effort.
The fighter is already expected to be the most expensive military aircraft ever produced
I saw a program on PBS America about the initial competition for the next generation aircraft. The aim was to keep costs low as previous aircraft contract costs had escalated. Nice to see the US Government have got costs under control. Under the control of Lockheed Martin, that is, not the US Government.