Re: Outstanding
only two options? Everyone knows the Ramans did things in three's
25368 publicly visible posts • joined 21 May 2010
""We believe this unprecedented overreach will have a chilling effect on long-term investment and contracting with the UK government. "
Yeah, Microsoft said something very similar over the CMA/Activision thing at the time. But they walked it back not long after. Lashing out when you lose seems to the be the "in thing" these days, but then in the cold light of day they realise that no matter how upset you are with a huge customer, you still need to play nice with them.
Oh, yeah, seen that on a smaller scale too. A shared building, and reception used desktops with WiFi, depspite there being Ethernet wall points. Installers set it all up on a Sunday and left. By Monday I was called in to find out why only one of the 3 reception computers was connecting. Turns out it's not two out of three specific devices failing, it's actually whichever one is switched on first that works. A quick WiFi channel scan found about 35[*] wireless access points across at least 15[*] distinct networks, all fighting over the channel space. Putting reception on to yet more WiFi was the final straw. The fix was to patch in the Ethernet ports to the correct switch :-)
Sometimes, WiFi is in use "because cool", not because it's actually required.
* Numbers made up, it was a few years ago now, but whatever the numbers were, they were too big for the available airspace.
It may not matter. I've seen this sort of proposal multiple times over the years and no one ever seems to suggest ways a probe massing a few grammes, no matter how big the swarm, will, be able to transmit back to Earth in a way that's not drowned out by the local star. On the other hand, who else may be behind the recurring push for this idea that might be able to re-purpose "a laser capable of beaming approximately 100 gigawatts" which, presumable, will need to be able to run continuously, not just a single short pulse between charges.
"What new ugly paradigm will they force upon us with Windows 12 next year, because surely flat is dated now?"
Good point! Yayyyy!!!!. What could be worse than "flat" look and non-obvious clickable links? Am I being too optimistic? I've never had to deal with arty designers, let alone UI designers, no my optimism may be misplaced by ignorance of just how bad a "new look" could be ;-)
"If every previous Windows UI is "dated and cheesy," then there is no reason to grow attached to the current incarnation."
And as for anything being dated, whether a UI, art, clothes etc, it's only because someone came up with a different concept and everyone followed the "new way", hence setting the "old way" into a date period and said new designer disparaging the old way and calling it dated in the first place. Don't get me wrong, some designs, fashions, whatever do get improved on, so moving on from isn't always bad, but often it's not improved on. It's just change for the sake of change, especially by fashion designers. It's the business model. The "important" people in the relevant industry tell the rest of the world what is cool and what isn't and most of the world follows along because "ooh, shiny".
You know what I miss most about GUIs? The way Win95/98 menus could be completely changed and re-ordered to suit what *I* want. Just open the relevant folder and start moving shortcuts around, creating new folders etc so the stuff I use most is where I expect to find it, or just dragging and dropping on the Start Menu itself. The current incarnation, at best, has "recently used" or "frequently used", which changes depending on what I...er..recently used. Which not only is not always what I next want, but the order changes every time I open it.
I have to use Win10 at work, and it's more like going back to what the Linux haters always complained about; the dreaded command line. It's easier to to type the program name in the search box than to go hunting through the menus!
That said, I recognise it's part of a widespread drive to declare every U.S. regulator unconstitutional. "I'm rich. There should be no constraint on my action or my ability to make more money."
They are fighting to go back to the age of the robber barons, the very reason most of the regulators exists in the first place.
There speaks someone who uses a word processor professionally. For the vast majority of home users, WordPad was adequate for writing up a quick letter to send to the BBC complaining about a rude word broadcast before the watershed and other similarly less complex text formatting jobs :-)
Back in the day, I used HyperCross on a TRS-80 to read and copy disks/files from many, many different systems and formats. It was amazingly powerful for the time. I think there was a less powerful version for the PC too. It was especially useful (and lucrative!) when local small businesses were transitioning from CP/M based systems to "IBM compatibles". About the only disks it couldn't read were hard sectored and weird stuff that did variable disk speed or sector sizes, which needed the proper drive type to even physically read the disk,
"which kind of implies that Musk is a fan of free speech"
It's not an implication. It's a statement of fact taken from Musks own utterings on the subject. He's stated many times that he's not only in favour of free speech, he is in fact a "free speech absolutist", which in effect means anything goes. All of that is quite different to the "Right to Free Speech" as it's usually mis-quoted from The Constitution. Hence the hypocrisy in how he deals with people who say things he doesn't like.
"So 400 miles or so?
Which is how much average person drives in a month"
It's actually a little over 600. But I suppose it depends on what you mean by average. Mostly, when we say "average" we mean the "Mean". Mode or Median may be what you meant since people like me who are high mileage drivers are probably skewing the "Mean" average upwards. But then there's a lot of cars out there, especially 2nd cars, which do far less than 400 or 600 miles per month. My recently retired friend isn't using anywhere near a full tank or petrol per month nowadays, more like half a tank :-)
"He only put up about $20bn of his own money, and then borrowed the rest."
Just for clarification though, he boroowed the money to buy the shares in his name. These other investors invested in Musk, not Twitter. They didn't buy shares in Twitter for themselves, at least mostly not. IIRC, Musk owns a shade under 80% of the company.
"the banks...they knew/know Elon isn't all that stable and doesn't have any business qualifications"
I don't think that matters to them. They just look at past performance. Just look at the sub-prime debacle and many, many other instances of banks getting it badly wrong financially, usually at huge cost and inconvenience to the rest of us poor plebs.
I'm not sure I agree with your comments re Tesla, assuming you're talking about Tesla as it is currently, since Tesla require that the driver is always technicall in control and should have their hands on the wheel when in motion, even having a warning system of sorts if you take your hands off the wheel. Drivers who choose to ignore that and/or defeat the warning systems are fully responsible for their actions. (lets assume a "perfect" world and not get into the arguments about misleading advertising and the perceptions that Tesla have helped reinforce in their customers.)
I think the discussion of laws catching up to technology is talking about fully autonomous self-driving, not the poor excuse that Tesla is currently using.
IIRC,. UK law, at least, refers to the driver or operator of the vehicle. I don't think it specifies that said driver or operator is human. Caveat: IANAL. As the UK legal system is based on case law, we'll probably have to wait and see what happens when the first serious accident or offence happens but I suspect judges may well declare who the responsible operator is, or at least I hope so.
Not only that, but autonomous vehicles and generally computer controlled vehicles have been roaming around factories and warehouse for quite some time now. If there's a work place accident, the company/owners/operators are on the hook for the compensation and fines. It could be argued that the "work place" is the public road network for self-driving cars :-)
Yes, I know this is the USA we are talking about and workplace health and safety is just some sort of commie conspiracy to increase business costs and make them less competitive (and yes, YMMV depending which State you are in) :-)
"(b) requiring that the car securely logs data relating to the involvement of autonomous modes and human input and makes it directly available to cops/judges/etc without it going via the manufacturer."
The first part of that is already done. The manufactures/operators want every last little byte and bit of data they can. But as we saw with the Cruise accident, they don't want to hand it over unless forced to, and even then, they try to only follow the precise letter of the subpoena, no more and no less. Companies might be "people", but they are sociopaths with no morals.
"all that case did was assert that _because_ corporations are people, _then_ they have the same free speech rights as human, specifically with regard to election funding (I agree that it was idiotic, as non-US-citizens are also people, but can't fund US election campaigns)."
By stretching the logic just a little further, that sounds like corporations are not just "people" but "citizens" too. Sadly they don't seem to be held to the same account as either "people" or "citizens". Once they get defined as citizens, they'll also be allowed to vote. Which then opens the can or worms as to how much a large corporations vote is worth compared to the average Joe. That could lead a real dystopia (well, more so than the US is already living through). ;-)
I suspect it's more a local culture thing rather than what colour the current ruling party is. Considering Trump and the Reps current reputation for abolishing and abusing regulations in favour of industry, I'm more surprised that Texas has actually got those laws in place already. Laws which "hamper business" and "stifle innovation" is exactly the position most Reps blame on the Dems so I would suggest that you bringing politics into it and blaming "Dems" is just plain wrong. Now if you'd just said "politicians" instead, I'd probably have agreed with you :-)
A quick google search tells me "The Consumer Rights Act 2015 states that items must be of satisfactory quality, as described, fit for purpose and last a reasonable length of time. You have these rights for six years in England and Wales or five years in Scotland."
I searched on the terms
uk consumer law reasonable lifetime
...and take your pick from the reputable results on the first page :-) It's worth knowing and understanding your rights.
Even Apple agrees! :-)
"I'm a volunteer at Oxfam Music."
Good to know. Sadly, my nearest one is Edinburgh, over a 100 miles away from here. But that has encouraged me to do a bit more research into what others are doing, and hopefully I'll find something a littler more local that does electricals/electronics :-)
"The Law has charities over a barrel, with a very big stick to smack their arses with. I work at a charity, but many of our staff and volunteers are PAT testers, so we can take electrical goods and provide PAT testing as a service to other charities."
I think you should name the charity, if in the UK. Please. I'd love to find one where I can not only donate unwanted electricals/electronics, but be able to buy them too.
Meanwhile, anyone know where I can dump a load of old VHS tapes, many bought ones with actual films on them? No one wants them any more. The best I can think of at the moment is the plastics recycling skip at the local tip "Recycling Village" :-)
I'm not sure where you are, but under UK consumer law, those MSI laptops were still under at least some level of warranty, as by law an item should last a "reasonable length of time" and yours, at least, was borked by a firmware upgrade, which MSI would be directly responsible for. The broken screen, maybe less so, depends what you meant by "broken", ie user damage, or failed electronics causing lines etc in the display. Once the two year warranty is up, manufactures are still obliged to repair, replace or refund some proportion of the original cost if it fails. With laptops, it's probably 5 years or so. Repairs may be charged at labour cost and/or you pay the carriage costs to return it (Parts should be free), but in practice, your complaint is with the supplier/seller, not the manufacturer, as that's who you entered into a contract with at the point of purchase. It's pretty much the same in the EU AFAIK, but could vary wildly in other jurisdictions.
I took a coffee machine back to a retailer after just under two years, they entered my card details, found the sales record, apologised that they no longer sold that model and offered a full refund or to choose a similar model off the shelf up to 20% over the cost of the faulty one, no questions asked. Currys/PCWorld, if anyone is interested.
"It will be gone toot sweet!"
You are Truly Scrumptious and ICM£5 :-)
I'm sure you meant the French phrase "tout suite". Or were you thinking of the film and truly meant Toot Sweet?
Money. Household recycling costs a lot to be separated at the recycling plant. Especially different types of plastics which is incredibly difficult if not impossible to automate. This means the recycling centres won't take it, or will just landfill anything not immediately obvious, such as drinks bottles. If it's not economically viable for the recycler to sort, they will refuse it. UK Government has set binding targets on Local Authorities for recycling and large costs per ton on anything going to landfill. This leave the local authorities with very little choice other than to enforce sorting on the householders. We're not too badly off here, with a single recycling bin for glass, card, metals and plastic with an "insert" bin that sits in the top for paper. But I predict we'll be having more sorting forced on us eventually, especially the plastics.
The economies of scale in the recycling world have grown a lot in recent years, but there's still that expensive manual sorting by humans going on in the plants and that will never scale.
When I was a kid, there only seemed to be maybe 4 or 5 common "standard" bulb fittings in Xmas light strings. Many were still MES fittings. And every shop that sold lights sold packs of spares. By the time I had my own house, it seemed like every year the shops bought from a different supplier and every one had a different fitting or voltage and spares where nigh on impossible to get. We still put up the incandescent bulb strings that work, but once they lose more than a couple of bulbs and there's no equivalent strings to "steal" from, they get binned so I guess eventually the last string will be replaced with LEDs to match the newer ones. Although I'll be sad when the 20m 4 colour, 4 channel rope light fails. It does proper "chase" patterns, unlike the vast majority of modern ones which seem to be only two channel so all you get is alternate flashing, not a "chase" pattern. I suppose I should start shopping around for one this year or next. That good one must be at least 20 years old now!
"None of the charities would accept electrical goods."
Yep. Yet another result of laws having unintended consequences. Re-sale of electrical goods make the seller responsible for said safety of those second hand goods. Not one charity I know will touch anything electrical with a barge pole. They won't do PAT on them, primarily because their insurers won't let them, even when one of the volunteers in the shop is a fully qualified sparky and is legally competent to do PAT.
If you ever watch any of the US retro computing youtube channels, they get some amazing finds at the various "thrift", "goodwill" and charity shops while all our old IT kits goes to landfill/WEEE recycling. Even donating old but decent IT kit to a school involves jumping through hoops, at a cost to us, if you can find one that will take it. The mantra is supposed to be REDUCE, RE-USE, RE-CYCLE. Only the first and last are viable options for most electricals in the UK, unless you can re-use it internally.
I'd forgotten ours was doing that the last time I went down. Got refused entry. Turned around, parked up a few 100yds away, went to the website and found a slot available in 15 mins booked it and then joined the back of the queue again :-)
Maybe I was lucky, or maybe they aren't actually all that busy. I just checked, and the system is that you enter your vehicle details etc before you even get to see what, if any, slots are available, so I didn't bother. They record your car reg and postcode and limit you to 2 visits per month or something like that, so didn't want to take the chance a "failed" booking might take up a possible future visit I may need.
"Take strings to the local primary school's repair cafe to see if someone can make them work again."
That seems to be the take Austria has on it, sort of. The government will pay you, thus subsidising the cost of having your items repaired. I read this the other day, after having had a few drinks, so my memory may be hazy, but IIRC (I prob. don't), you take your item to the repair centre and pay up front for the repair and then claim a voucher which will pay you back half the repair cost up to €100 in "a few weeks". A "carrot" to get stuff repaired, but the "stick" is applied to all tax payers, even those who look after their kit and are less likely to need repairs.
I can see the point in encouraging repairs, but as we have all seen on all government subsidy schemes, it encourages the providers to put their prices up. A €50 repair suddenly costs €65 but the customer doesn't complain because they still get paid €32.50 back from the incentive scheme, so they still got it "cheaper" than before.
And, of course, there's the "fashion" trends. A lot of kitchen small electricals get binned because they don't match this years colour scheme :-(
"and it's likely image processing capability change as we age as well, Steel said. ".
Yeah, it's all JPeG encoding. And every so often the brain does a defrag, moves the images around and re-encodes them. Thus the fading memories as one grows older.
It's possible you were one of the beta testers for PNG but have had an "update" since then :-)
"but double extortion scenarios involve the group threatening to leak the stolen data if a ransom demand isn't met."
I've read and re-read that statement and the the surrounding paragraphs, but I still don't understand what the phrase "double extortion" means. I see a single threat for a single payment.
"But as for autopilot, I'm quite comfortable with its naming versus expectations versus actual performance. Should one blame Tesla if consumers idea of what an autopilot is, has been distorted out of all recognition by Hollywood?"
Yes, yes we should. The only people who understand autopilot for what it actually is are people in aviation such as yourself and ships officers, sailors etc. Tesla would have been fully aware when they named it, what the "common conception" would be because people in the room when it was chosen would have had exactly those same conceptions. It's on a par with brand names becoming homogenised through common usage, eg Hoover, Sellotape (or Scotch Tape in the US, Durex in Oz) etc. Whether we should apportion some blame to Hollywood is an interesting point, but words, names and their meanings change over time, for all sorts of reasons.