Re: Invention
At least they can't use "on a mobile device" this time around. We have legs! :-)
25376 publicly visible posts • joined 21 May 2010
And additionally, unlit roads outside of built-up areas which are national speed limit by default[*] unless otherwise signed and don't always have repeater signs, especially the more rural ones.
It seems speed awareness courses don't actually cover everything that the Highway Code covers in relation to speed limits based on two testimonies above, which is the actual "go to" place to learn about the rules of the road, something every driver is supposed to learn before they even pass their test, not at a speed awareness course after they broke the rules.
* Other caveats may apply. It's all in The Highway Code for those who care to read it.
Auto-dip? Oh FFS! It's bad enough we have to suffer people driving with headlights on because it's a bit cloudy, or nearing dusk, where sidelights are all you need. I've seen car auto headlights come on because the sun is low in the evening and the road goes between embankments. Coming out the other end, the sun is still shining, I still need my singlasses on, but all those "clever" cars don't quite see enough light to turn of the fscking headlights.
Worst case was dealing with a driver who was in a hire car without auto headlights and didn't know where the light switch was so driving up a motorway in the dark without lights. Stupid driver was old enough that auto-on headlights were not around when he passed his test but still thought it ok that if he didn't know how to switch the lights on it was still ok to drive. Allowing drivers to think they can switch to full beam always and let the car worry about when to dip them is just asking for trouble when we have people like that on the roads.
"not layoffs for down turns"
At the very least, these are sackings/firings, not lay-offs. I know common usage in the US frequently uses "lay-off" for mass sackings, but the term lay-off, especially as linked by you with "downturn" for context implies it's temporary and the workers will be re-hired in a few weeks or months when things pick up again. Now, I'n all that familiar with US employment law or the WARN Act, but not all those fired employees are in "at will" jurisdictions, or even in the USA, so there most definitely ARE ex-Twitter employees who have been fired in breach of local laws, both in the US and other countries.
Advertisers? According to the article half of the company's top 100 advertisers, who collectively spent over $750 million in ads last year,
So even if all those top 100 advertisers were still there and paying their bills, that annual income is still only 2 months worth of loan payments. So if we assume an even spread and that losing half the top 100 advertises only loses half the spend, that's only one month loan payments from a year of advertisers fees. The question that leads to is how many smaller advertisers are still there and what does that add up to? I suppose we can infer something from the last set up Twitter accounts when they were still publicly traded. I can't be arsed to go look :-)
Not all that much reduced. He's also personally on the hook for billions. It's "only" the bank loans that are leveraged against Twitter, ie the value of Twitter is the security the banks accepted as security against the loans. Not to mention the reputation damage caused if and when he needs investors or bank loans for future ventures.
Maybe they were DVD+R discs? Also, ISTR some methods of "formatting" or preparing write-once optical disks such that you could still add to them later and/or "overwrite" files. I would guess that the backup process in the article may have used a proprietary backup solution that required something special on the discs before being used as part of a backup set. The caddy bit seems to date it a good while back in optical disc terms unless they were not actually DVDs as stated in the article. There were various more specialised optical discs in caddies that didn't go mainstream. In fact, I don't remember any standard DVDs using caddies. They pretty much disappeared right at the very early days when CDs were still running at single or double speed. I still have an old IBM SCIS 5.25" CD-ROM single speed drive that uses a caddy left over from my Amiga days. It was obsolete when I acquired it :-)
Back in the day, Sky and Virgin Media got into a spat over broadcast rights and the costs of sharing. Sky want to bump up the prices to VM. VM complained that Sky was raising the prices to cut VM out of the loop and become a monopoly. It went to court and Sky was told they must share their channels at a reasonable price so as not to become a monopoly and be subject to some very stringent oversight. They reluctantly agreed with the courts and regulators decision and a list of the channels and price points was drawn up. Very shortly afterwards, Sky created a new channel, Sky Atlantic, not in the sharing agreement and all the "good" stuff moved to that channel, gutting their so-called premier channel SkyOne to a Simpsons repeat channel. So VM got to re-broadcast the Sky owned channels at prices that keeps them in the game and Sky still got their exclusive content that VM only get on repeat a year or so later.
Dealing with and preventing monopolies is complicated and potential monopolist WILL use every trick in the book and then some to create advantage.
That strikes me as a "commercially sensitive" and not surprising that they've not published cost breakdowns. After all, that would tell us all how much extra they make on re-use launches and might affect how much customers are prepared to pay. I think we can infer from the booster turnaround times that there's not a huge amount of refurbishment work going on. IIRC the fastest turnaround time was 21 days or so, which sounds reasonable for a thorough examination, replacement or whatever of any single use parts etc. ie far far less "refurb" than any Shuttle parts needed which strongly implies it far cheaper to re-use a booster than build and throw away a new one. I think they are averaging more than 4 flights per booster these days.
"Dell's answer was to turn down the acceleration slider."
Sometimes, when buying bleeding edge GFX cards, that was the actual manufacturers fix. Hardware rushed out without proper testing was often "fixed" in software. A temporary "fix" would be to turn down or off the more advanced features in the driver options. Eventually a new GFX card driver would appear which disabled the faulty function(s) and replace them with software in the driver and the user could turn the slider back up to ELEVEN!!!. Of course, to the average users, the new driver "fixed" the problem while the rest us knew they'd just kludged a workaround. It probably still happens today and with all sorts of other hardware.
I give you Armley Gyratory, Leeds, W. Yorkshire.
Has anyone here tried any of these "AI" image generators? Can you replicate a result by giving it the same inputs or does the "AI" inject randomness? Or is the "AI" changing as new data is input such that giving it exactly the same input tomorrow as you did today will generate a different result?
"For example, if we all held copyright to different pieces (I own the soundtrack for the first hour, person A owns the second hour, person B owns most of the screenplay, person C owns the part of the screenplay where the scientists are describing the situation because Person B got the technobabble all wrong, and person D owns the footage for the background), then things break down if person D needs to leave but we still want to set my introductory piece to their scenery, because they can't give us their copyrights even if they want to."
Actually, that is exactly how it works in much of the media industry, TV and film in particular. There will be many different rights holders involved in some productions. I'm not in the industry, but have seen and heard how, in at least some instances, getting all the various rights needed for a production can take time and negotiations. The one that sticks in my mind is Terry Nation (well, his estate) owns the rights to the Daleks, The BBC has to licence any use of the Daleks in Dr Who from the estate. Likewise if you need to set a mood or time period in a TV or film production, you need music that the audience will immediately associate with the moment and in many case that will mean licence one or more music tracks, which could mean negotiating rights with lyrics authors, music arrangers and performers or, if your lucky, just with a single entity like a record label.
In that instance, yes. Because the AI will only be finding what it's been programmed to find, ie one of the needles in the vast array of haystacks. What it found may be useless in terms of practical use since it may also kill the patient. That extra work to find if the "cure" is usable.non-lethal and safe for use on patients takes a lot more human work.
There are al;l sorts of situations where murdering a business competitor could be justified by "good business practice", but other than in criminal enterprises, it's actually quite rare for many reasons. Mainly that most people are not murderers and the likelihood of being caught. Changing copyright such that it expires when the holder expires is very unlikely to noticeably affect the murder rates.
I wonder how this affects that blokie who used to throw paint into the exhaust stream of a parked jet aircraft and "blow" paint onto the canvas? At best, all he was choosing was the selection and order of colours. I'd like to see him prove that he can replicate his results using skill as an "artist".
...but what exactly is a 10% speed drop when using Starlink? The article goes to great pains to mention speed increases and decreases, but nowhere in the article is a base level or maximum level of speed actually enumerated. After all, most people would probably not notice a 10-20% speed drop in a 10Gb/s connection but would surely complain about the same 10-20% drop in a 1Mb/s connection.
"that's something that researchers and clinicians (and me) have been doing for the last 50 years."
On a mobile[1] device?
[1] No, not a trolley on wheels, "mobile device" in patent terms only seems to apply to mobile phones, tablets and "wearables"[2]
[2] No, in patent terms, "wearables" does not mean clothes in any form unless they have embedded electronics.
So, with no idea of what I'm talking about, how much extra mass are we seeing here? How much "missing mass" is there in the theories such that we postulated "dark matter" to account for it? Does this mean we now have less "missing mass"? Might we eventually dismiss "dark matter" as a silly invention of primitive scientists to account for stuff we don't understand in the same way as "the aether" and phlogiston? Also, if there's significantly more matter than we thought, how does that affect our understanding of dark energy?
Am I not only barking up not just the wrong tree but am in an entirely different forest?
"Seems to me like they're seeing this problem as a nail because the only too they have is a (chat) hammer"
“We'll be saying a big hello to all intelligent lifeforms everywhere and to everyone else out there, the secret is to bang the rocks together, guys.”
― Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
Pretty much every time I've had to deal with a "chatbot" of that type, I've almost always ended the conversation with "clearly you are not able to help. Please report this conversation in full to your masters". Whether they do or not, I don't know. Who they consider their masters to be is something else.
"[1] A fact that those who get all their information on us Yanks from DearOldTelly and that side of the Tubes of Ewe might do well to ponder on."
Spot on! That's how my views of life in the US has been created :-)
I know what you mean about the circles you move in though. I had a computer at home from about 1978/79 or so. My close friends also did and was part of the reason why we were close friends. Like minded hobbyists. So from my point of view it also seemed like "everyone" had a home computer. As my interest in all things computing evolved from hobby to the industry, I very quickly realised that most people didn't have a computer at home. I see the same "closed circle of friends" in other areas too where they think everyone else is just like them, an easy trap to fall into, especially when we were young and had less life experience back then :-)
Even when the 486 was pervasive in the industry, I'd not describe home computers as pervasive in general. Not by a large margin. Even when the Pentium CPU first came out, less than 20% of households had a computer. And by computer, that could be any make or model including Spectrums, Amigas etc. In 1993 when a 486DX2-66 was top of the range, you could still go out and buy a new budget PC of XT grade with a piddly little 20MB HDD or even a dual floppy, no HDD model. It wasn't until this century that computer ownership reach 50% of households.
"A quick test on an unlocked PC showed that the filters were indeed doing their job, and she actually wanted to go to moneyworld.co.uk. She was most embarrassed when I explained this to her."
Yes, one of the unintended consequences of both the publicity .com got in the media (and still does) thanks to the "dot com boom" and the desperation so many "local" companies have for wanting .com URIs. Many, many users sort of expect a web address to end in .com. Possibly less of an issue these days with so many people just searching for sites rather than manually typing in an address. Even now, some people look at you funny if you give them a URI with .co.uk or anything other than .com unless they deal regularly with, eg. .gov.uk or .edu.uk.
"But even so, this lament seems old - wasn't 'pulp fiction' the previous threat to serious writing?"
The printing press? That will ruin the value of REAL books, wrought by the hand of a scribe!
Yeah, tech causes ructions when it first appears, then everything settles down again. Artists and writers are the current "target" for automation and many will probably drop out or stop being profitable and therefore less productive. It'll be harder, or at least different, for up-and-comg-coming artists and writers to break through and be noticed. But not impossible. We just have to look at every "craft" ever that has been partially ousted by automation or mass manufacture. Baking bread, making pottery, cabinet making, and pretty much every other product that most people buy today was an "artisan" product in the past that was hard to get a hold of and very expensive. But most of not all of those artisan crafts are still around, still expensive and still hard to get. But there's cheap mass produced stuff always available cheaply for the..err..masses. Just like "pulp fiction" and the "penny dreadfuls" of yesteryore were often very poor but sold in their droves.
Maybe never if it becomes standard. Few people work a 6 day week[*] these days since that new fangled idea of only working 5 days caught on :-)
* some of the people posting above excepted of course. Although anyone working 50-60 or more hours per week, especially where it's expected, standard and in some cases even unpaid, well, you're in the wrong job. Ok maybe for a short period, or to gain experience but anyone on a fixed salary should only be doing extra hours when it's needed, ie exceptions, not standard practice and should be a decent enough salary to account for those hours. Voluntarily working more hours for more pay because you need or want the extra cash is a different thing.
I suspect that would be more likely since otherwise you'd have some companies operating, eg Mon-Thurs, some operating Tues-Fri and other Mon-Fri. Companies need to interact with other companies so without a national decision for everyone to go Mon-Thurs confusion will likely abound. Likewise, with this international interconnected world, there would still be problems dealing with the rest of the world. Time zones already cause enough confusion without wondering whether a particular company will be operating on a particular day.
"I found the article strange to say 4 days and no hours change, I'm sure everyone would be pleased if they are paid for a 37.5 hour work week (5 days) but only did 30 hours (4 days) of actual work. Seems a good deal."
From the article "The crucial point of the pilot, in which 3,000 UK-based employees participated, was that no one's salaries changed, nor were they required to work extended hours, the so-called "4×10 schedule" (four 10-hour shifts) tested by Atlassian and others."
I think there may be different trials being referred to here or different companies trialled different ways of achieving a 4 day week.
Back in the day, when I was late teens and working at the local swimming pool, we switched to a 4 day week with 2x10 + 2x9.5 (39 hour week was standard then). It was great. Closed on Sundays and about about every 6 weeks, the shift pattern meant days off were Fri, Sat & Sun followed the next weeks pattern of Mon, Tues, Sun so almost a week off every 6 weeks :-)
Since they are only asking for 3 days per week in the office, ie hybrid, I suspect quite a lot of those who said "over my dead body" will still show up. There will be a spectrum of people for and against returning to the office from the hard core to the "well, it's only three day a week, I might as well". With a partial, but compulsory return to the office, it's much less of a black and white issue