everything has to be somewhere.
Posts by Robert E A Harvey
3010 publicly visible posts • joined 8 Oct 2006
Page:
London Mayor shows off GIANT BLUE COCK in busy square
Surface RT: A plan worthy of the South Park Underpants Gnomes
Wilfully stupid
>believing that they could come in to the market as a new player,
> but with products launching at Apple prices.
Doing that at all was, as you say, Arrogant.
Doing it after watching HP go face-first with the WebOs products - making exactly the same mistake - is beyond Arrogant, it is Wilful Stupidity.
Free cloud server self-destructs in 35 minutes
Good luck to him
It's not a bad idea. It gives people the chance to try something out quickly. The $6 is cheaper than paying an engineer to do something from scratch. If he is up-front about the costs, and the timeout on the free one, well good luck to him.
And if people are stupid enough to pay him his rates on a long term basis, well good luck to him. Stupid deserves to bleed, it's how we keep the market fit.
Microsoft's earnings down on slow Windows sales, Surface RT bust
HP the only PC maker to bleed distie sales in Blighty
Brit telly, laptop flogger Gimmi goes titsup owing whopping £1m
Trusted the bankers?
"the lender hiked its charge per transaction from 1.75 per cent to 5.45 per cent"
just like the interest-free period on yer credit card running out. You cannot base a business plan on the introductory offer. Who could not have seen this coming?
[Banker: interesting business here, why should he be making the profit instead of us? I know...]
Look out, Lenovo! HP: We're not happy with being a 'number two'
CIOs bombarded with hybrid cloud surveys
Planet-busting British space bullet ready to bomb ice moon Europa
Pure boffinry: We peek inside Nokia's miracle cameraphone
Microsoft lathers up Windows 8.0 Surface RT for quick price shave
Cubesats to go interplanetary with tiny plasma drives
Is your Apple gadget made of human misery and eco-ruin?
All gadgets
"Is your Apple gadget made of human misery and eco-ruin?"
I can't see that Apple are any different in this regard than anyone else. You can go and buy a reasonable quality socket set (in a nasty blown plastic case) for a couple of hours wages. When I started work it would have been a couple of months wages.
When I was brining up my girls a school uniform would have cost us a few hundred pounds. Now, decades of inflation later, you can get one from Tesco for a tenner. They are not made by the school uniform fairy.
This is a major success of capitalism (I nearly wrote crapitalism) and a major failing of society.
Forecast cloudy as Office 365 pushes into 38 new markets
Swollen cloud could burst at any time, splatter us with FAIL – anxious tech biz
Is it a BIRD? Is it a plane? Right first time – and she's in SPANDEX
BAN UK tax breaks on patented tech, fumes German finance minister
European Space Agency goes for mostly solid Ariane 6
Sky asks Ofcom to unlock BT cabinets
Re: Virgin
I'd like to see the Virgin cable network in Lincolnshire.
Back in the 1950s the 'redifussion' system was part of the build when new towns were constructed.
Since the Millenium we have had estates added to Bourne and Spalding etc. that have doubled their population. Why was cable not compulsory for these builders if we are serious as a nation about competition?
Euro GPS Galileo gets ready for nuclear missile use
Subscription
I thought, all along, the idea was to have a subscription-based service (even if it was a one-time cost rolled into the price of the reciever) to provide commerical resiliance over government fickleness. I'd even be quite happy to punch in a 20-digit number sent out each year to EU taxpayers. If I had to subscribe separately I'd pay a fiver a year.
I understand that lots of recievers have both glonass and navstar, but I have yet to see a reciever with a big switch saying "believe the yanks" or "believe the cossaks". when "believe the beethovenists" becomes available it will be interesting to see what happens.
Big Beardie is watching you: Lord Sugar gets into facial recognition
not really ID
This doesn't sound as bad as people are making out - there seems to be no intention to identify a named individual, although there is always the possiblity that the security people will want access but it all sounds stand-alone to me.
That said, since I just walk past billboards 95% of the time, and the other 5% of the time I am staring in complete bewilderment as thought at an alien culture, I do think they have some software challenges ahead.
Why don't we all wear Bill Oddie masks like Clarkson driving across america?
Universities teach us a thing or two about BYOD
Eduroam, and similar
I have always been impressed by the quality of Eduroam, and in an earlier life Janet, and all the other academic networks: look at the volumes of data that astronomers share, with apparent ease.
I suspect that the reason is management. The institutions are clearly in the hands of the academics, and the IT people are clearly expected to provide a working system.
Compare that to the commercial world, for example $MEGACORP type working, where IT has been outsourced to the likes of ATOS, and they have no understanding of who is the tail and who is the dog. Getting anything fixed or done is all but impossible.
Now look at government: government computing fails because the people who think they are in charge have not the faintest idea of what they want to do, and even less of how it may be done, so the people selling them systems can get away with murder.
Congratulations to the academic world for running things properly, I say!
Government dials 999. What service do you require? DIGITAL
Apple surrenders in 'app store' trademark suit against Amazon
Re: Oh
I would like to see a contempt-of-court type sanction where the judge can just fine one (or both) sides for being vexatious litigants and wasting everyone's time. Would have come in handy with SCO/IBM as well.
5 billion paid to the public defence system to help the impoverished get justice would go down rather nicely, I feel.
Inventor lobs spherical, throwable camera
Acer Iconia W3: The first 8-inch Windows 8 Pro tablet
Sleek Nokia Lumia details EXPOSED ahead of Thursday's disrobing
OFFICIAL: Humans will only tolerate robots as helpful SLAVES
Re: "self-awareness"
>is it self-awareness or just a simulation of such?
does it matter? (That's the round two question for you!)
Would that affect how you treat them?
If so, how can you justify treating humans differently? You have no way of knowing if the people around you are real, simulated, or a figment of your imagination. You just need to act in the right way regardless.
re: 'once they look sufficiently human.'
I'm not too worried what they look like, but if they are individually sentient and intellectually capable, I would expect to treat them as equal.
I'm not going to treat an automatic vacuum cleaner as an equal, but an Artificial Intelligence would deserve respect.