@Lozzyho
I wouldn't pay for Ultimate, but Home Premium is good value... considering Apple manage to charge shedloads for a service pack, I mean.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What??!!!
Apple has never charged a penny for any update, ever. Upgrades, yes. Updates, never.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moving on:
What I believe that the entire industry is missing, is that enough is enough. Whether we are on Windows or OSX, there is vastly more functionality than most people can handle, let alone, understand. Simply throwing more and more features at any OS does not hack it any longer.
"OOOh look at that!" The window spins!"
"Oh man! That is sOO yesterday! Where's my Evian water, and Burberry condom?"
In terms of a GUI, OS 10.5 still beats Vista, yet as a lifelong Mac user I will neither be upgrading to 10.5.x, nor switching boxes. As far as I am concerned I have exactly what I want: a stable platform. a suite of (expensive) applications, and a small but valuable host of very satisfied clients serviced by my 10.4.x. box, if you will pardon the expression.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Leopard offers this die-hard Mac user nothing other than cost of upgrade, grief in getting early releases to work properly, and expensive upgrades to several applications to get them to work on 10.5, only to discover they work just like they did before. And what is the benefit to my customers?
Four fifths of five eighths of FA as far as I can see.
Apart from spinning windows, when I demo a new marketing campaign. I can anticipate the yawns right now.
Client: "Wow! The window spins! Cool! Now how does this solve my problem?"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cut to scene 2:
Vista?: Exactly the same.