Official sales
China is a large buyer of iShiny imported from other countries. Is this counted?
1188 posts • joined Monday 3rd September 2007 03:00 GMT
With the very first windows logo, which nobody knows or remembers, skewed "to give it perspective".
That's top work from top marketing agencies right there.
China is a large buyer of iShiny imported from other countries. Is this counted?
Whereas the IRS engages to terrorist-type activities, including hiring mercenaries, in order to collect back taxes from people who have left the United States.
I thought it would be about pint... Of beer, that is.
No interest, then.
UK should drive on the right, like the rest of the world!
From what I understood, other web sites were illegally publishing the pictures, which were then crawled by Google.
Fun fact: The founder of Perfect 10 is a math professor turned poker player. Met him at an academic conference once.
Seriously, why? That is a rare case where what is decided in one state has very little chance of having any kind of influence in another one.
Why catastrophic? Or rather, catastrophic for who? Oracle, or Andrew Orlowski?
Oh no, you are not alone. I suspect web designers will learn to place important links right next to ads in the near future.
They want to be the partner leader. They are not going to share with Apple, Google or Amazon...
There is normally a link at the top of the comments allowing to go back to the article. For some reason, on this article, it this disappears behind a cloud banner...
The last thing I'd want is to get CEOs fired one after another. But hey, I'm not (thankfully) so do what you want Mr Loeb.
I get bugged by sentences which state "the average Chinese works so many hours", rather than "Chinese work so many hours in average".
Hungry's no country I ever heard of...
We attacked them because we thought they had no patents; but now they bought some to hit us with... No fair!
Calm down, fanboy o_0
They could always ask Google to do it?
How could have I failed to realize that iPods and iPhones and iPads, which make the vast majority of Apple's income, and are consumer devices, are actually not fit to be your work platform? Surely Apple will go bankrupt any time now.
I hope Nokia manages soon to create a Windows 8 workstation and avoid that fate.
In all the articles I have written, I use the same paragraphs to introduce the general topic...
FLAGGED: You are plagiarizing 1,234,567 articles with the sentence "Machine learning has a multitude of applications". Please reword it.
As opposed to what company which is paying more than that for bugs?
Yeah, do you even know how HARD it is these days to find a computer that can read my backups on 5 1/4'' floppy disks? Without even talking about my punch cards...
The PageRank patent belongs to Standford University. Google has exclusive license rights, though.
Sorry, I prefer the minor errors in dates to letting PR people edit articles. If you are not happy, create another wiki and compete.
What money? If Twitter will not sue people who infringe on a patent, how will it get any money for it?
Apart from that, I assume Twitter employees who write a patent already get a cash bonus, which is likely to be more than whatever the employee could get out of it otherwise.
The classic is still better than what Ubisoft came up with!
Actually, considering the trinity at the top of Google owns a majority of voting shares, they do not need to care about the publicly-traded shares...
You owe me a new keyboard!
Anyway, all websites collecting your private information, such as Google, Facebook and the like have in their T&Cs that they can do whatever they want with the information, that your are granting them the right to do whatever they want with the pictures you upload, etc.
By using them, you are foregoing your privacy AND the copyright to all your data... So insisting that private information is protected by copyright serves no purpose.
"Better than expected" == They actually sold some.
Nokia never had any significant presence in America.
Or did he just keep it to get a payment out of Google? I believe this is a key point of such rulings.
Of course, the domain must have been near unusable: "address at gmail dot D E... No, not googlemail, gmail... And that's D E, not com! Yes, it's my address... No, it's not google..."
...Or something equivalent.
Off for a beer!
The price of AOL jumps up 40% in a single day, and they still manage to complain.
This seems to be glasses that have a screen inside, and display a stream coming from a camera with additional info overlaid. The Google thing look more like a heads-up display.
Still, he earned a beer!
This will hurt the resale value in China...
Easy: First, sell the stock. Then, sue the company for the loss you made. At that point, you don't care if it does go bankrupt.
Welcome to America, Facebook.
That untold millions are going to be spent without people using any of these technologies. Especially as long as they tie you to a single system.
@AC19:21 Would you rather give your money to AT&T?
Indeed, no RAID 5. See details on BAARF.
Apparently, this is not stopping their teenagers from getting it on. Their teen pregnancy rate is three times that of Europe. And how's this abstinence thing working for you?
A whole fruit basket in this case, I dare say...
I actually read somebody complaining that after they log out and remove all cookies because they don't want to be tracked, website X inexplicably forgets all their settings.
That I understand, he is worth about 0.98 Jobs on the tyrant scale... But he does get fairly impressive results, too.
I am surprised not to see him on the list, considering Meg Whitman is. Maybe I give her too little credit.
I predict that in a few years, we will feel sadness when Microsoft finds itself in the same situation.
I would say this is normal behavior. On the contrary, I find weird people who wait for weeks until an app becomes cheaper, all that to save less money than what they would spend on a beer. Or people who adamantly refuse to pay $2 for an app that would be useful to them.
When you think logically about it, most paying apps cost almost nothing.
They are arguing over what, $2 millions? Isn't this far less than what they already paid for lawyers?
Also, I thought that the copyright claims had largely been considered bogus?
I am wondering where all the money goes. We need some oversight with teeth, and fast.
I could not make heads or tails of all the acronyms in the article.
...all right, I could not bother to Google for it either.
I suppose audio books do cost money to make, and have such a small audience that they need to get the money back [i]some[/i]how...
That said, what happened to these reader apps that automatically read e-books aloud? Last I remember, copyright owners were claiming this was illegal because it amounted to giving a public performance, which merely owning the book does not give you the right to do. Did that ever get resolved?